Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38331096›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2024

Workshop summary: building an NHANES for the future.

Anne Frances Johnson, Nancy Lamontagne, Shilpa N Bhupathiraju, Alison Gm Brown, Heather A Eicher-Miller, Victor L Fulgoni, Colin D Rehm, Katherine L Tucker, Catherine E Woteki, Sarah D Ohlhorst

Abstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anne Frances JohnsonCreative Science Writing, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Nancy LamontagneCreative Science Writing, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Shilpa N BhupathirajuChanning Division of Network Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Alison Gm BrownClinical Applications and Preventions Branch, Division of Cardiovascular Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Heather A Eicher-MillerDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.
Victor L FulgoniNutrition Impact, LLC, Battle Creek, MI, United States.
Colin D RehmResearch & Development, PepsiCo, Inc., Purchase, NY, United States.
Katherine L TuckerDepartment of Biomedical and Nutritional Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, United States.
Catherine E WotekiDepartment of Food Science & Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Sarah D OhlhorstAmerican Society for Nutrition, Rockville MD, United States. Electronic address: sohlhorst@nutrition.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American Society for Nutrition's (ASN) Committee on Advocacy and Science Policy (CASP) organized a workshop, "Building a National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the Future," held during NUTRITION 2023, which took place in Boston, MA in July 2023. CASP had already identified an urgent need for increased support and modernization to ensure that a secure future for NHANES is achievable. The survey faces challenges associated with data collection, stagnant funding, and a need for more granular data for subpopulations and groups at risk. The workshop provided an overview of NHANES, including the nutrition component, and the many other uses for the survey's data, which extend beyond nutrition. Speakers highlighted NHANES's current and emerging challenges, as well as possible solutions to address these challenges, especially with regard to response rates of underrepresented groups, linkage of survey data to other resources, incorporation of new survey methodologies, and emerging data needs. The workshop also included a "Town Hall" component to gather additional feedback on NHANES' challenges and proposed solutions from audience members. The workshop provided many possible action items that ASN will explore and use to inform effective continued advocacy in support of NHANES and to find possible opportunities for ASN and others to partner with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics to strengthen this vital survey and maintain its robust and relevant data moving forward.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusBostonHumansNutrition SurveysSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesdatahealthNHANESnutritionsurvey challenges

Identifiers

PMID38331096
PMCPMC11181347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.