Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38330877›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of emergency medicine2024

Management of high-risk pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: A narrative review.

Samuel G Rouleau, Scott D Casey, Christopher Kabrhel, David R Vinson, Brit Long

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel G RouleauDepartment of Emergency Medicine, UC Davis Health, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: srouleau@ucdavis.edu.
Scott D CaseyKaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Vallejo Medical Center, Vallejo, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: scott.d.casey@kp.org.
Christopher KabrhelDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Center for Vascular Emergencies, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America. Electronic address: ckabrhel@mgb.org.
David R VinsonKaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Roseville Medical Center, Roseville, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: drvinson@ucdavis.edu.
Brit LongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, United States of America. Electronic address: Brit.long@yahoo.com.
Kaiser Permanente · USKaiser Permanente Roseville Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USSan Antonio Military Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Supplemental Oxygen for Pulmonary Embolism (SO-PE) - A Mechanistic Clinical TrialR01HL168040 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHRISTOPHER KABRHEL · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL168040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is a complex, life-threatening condition, and emergency clinicians must be ready to resuscitate and rapidly pursue primary reperfusion therapy. The first-line reperfusion therapy for patients with high-risk PE is systemic thrombolytics (ST). Despite consensus guidelines, only a fraction of eligible patients receive ST for high-risk PE.

objectiveThis review provides emergency clinicians with a comprehensive overview of the current evidence regarding the management of high-risk PE with an emphasis on ST and other reperfusion therapies to address the gap between practice and guideline recommendations. DISCUSSION: High-risk PE is defined as PE that causes hemodynamic instability. The high mortality rate and dynamic pathophysiology of high-risk PE make it challenging to manage. Initial stabilization of the decompensating patient includes vasopressor administration and supplemental oxygen or high-flow nasal cannula. Primary reperfusion therapy should be pursued for those with high-risk PE, and consensus guidelines recommend the use of ST for high-risk PE based on studies demonstrating benefit. Other options for reperfusion include surgical embolectomy and catheter directed interventions.

conclusionsEmergency clinicians must possess an understanding of high-risk PE including the clinical assessment, pathophysiology, management of hemodynamic instability and respiratory failure, and primary reperfusion therapies.

Indexed as

Pulmonary EmbolismThrombolytic TherapyEmbolectomyEmergency Service, HospitalFibrinolytic AgentsHumansTreatment OutcomeFibrinolytic AgentsCardiac arrestHigh-risk pulmonary embolismMassive pulmonary embolismPulmonaryPulmonary embolismThrombolyticsVascularVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID38330877
PMCPMC12043284
OpenAlexW4391508675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.