ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2024
Recovery of the spatially-variant deformations in dual-panel PET reconstructions using deep-learning.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep unrolled regularization for limited-angle dual-panel positron emission mammography.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Improving dual-panel in-beam PET imaging for proton therapy monitoring using 3D U-Net.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based restoration of PET images from a dual-panel breast dedicated scanner.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Article
- Image reconstruction and elongation artifact reduction for a dual-panel dedicated prostate PET scanner.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Quantitative evaluation of spatially-variant deformations recovered by deep learning on clinical-like breast lesions.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2025Article
- Image Synthesis in Nuclear Medicine Imaging with Deep Learning: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dual panel PET systems, such as Breast-PET (B-PET) scanner, exhibit strong asymmetric and anisotropic spatially-variant deformations in the reconstructed images due to the limited-angle data and strong depth of interaction effects for the oblique LORs inherent in such systems. In our previous work, we studied time-of-flight (TOF) effects and image-based spatially-variant PSF resolution models within dual-panel PET reconstruction to reduce these deformations. The application of PSF based models led to better and more uniform quantification of small lesions across the field of view (FOV). However, the ability of such a model to correct for PSF deformation is limited to small objects. On the other hand, large object deformations caused by the limited-angle reconstruction cannot be corrected with the PSF modeling alone. In this work, we investigate the ability of deep-learning (DL) networks to recover such strong spatially-variant image deformations using first simulated PSF deformations in image space of a generic dual panel PET system and then using simulated and acquired phantom reconstructions from dual panel B-PET system developed in our lab at University of Pennsylvania. For the studies using real B-PET data, the network was trained on the simulated synthetic data sets providing ground truth for objects resembling experimentally acquired phantoms on which the network deformation corrections were then tested. The synthetic and acquired limited-angle B-PET data were reconstructed using DIRECT-RAMLA reconstructions, which were then used as the network inputs. Our results demonstrate that DL approaches can significantly eliminate deformations of limited angle systems and improve their quantitative performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.