Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38330172›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2024

Evaluation of the Specificity of the 2023 Duke-International Society of Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases Classification for Infective Endocarditis.

Hugo Moisset, Julien Rio, Johan Benhard, Florence Arnoult, Laurene Deconinck, Nathalie Grall, Bernard Iung, Xavier Lescure, François Rouzet, Gaspard Suc and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of the 2015 and 2023 Duke-European Society of Cardiology Criteria Among Patients With Suspected Infective Endocarditis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hugo MoissetInfectious Diseases Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Julien RioParis Cité University, Paris, France.
Johan BenhardInfectious Diseases Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Florence ArnoultDepartment of Physiology, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Laurene DeconinckInfectious Diseases Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Nathalie GrallMicrobiology Laboratory, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Bernard IungParis Cité University, Paris, France.
Xavier LescureInfectious Diseases Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
François RouzetParis Cité University, Paris, France.
Gaspard SucCardiology Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, AP-HP, LVTS U1148, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France.
Bruno HoenInfectious Diseases Department, Nancy University Hospital, Brabois Hospitals  Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3070-3017
Claire Amaris HobsonInfectious Diseases Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8800-270X
Xavier DuvalParis Cité University, Paris, France.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2023 Duke-ISCVID (International Society of Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases) classification is a new diagnostic tool for infective endocarditis, updating the 2000 modified Duke and the 2015 European Society for Cardiology (ESC) classifications. In comparison, its sensitivity is higher; however, its specificity remains to be evaluated and compared to that of the 2 other classifications in endocarditis suspected patients.

methodsWe retrospectively collected the characteristics of patients hospitalized in Bichat University's Hospital, Paris, in 2021, who had been evaluated for clinical suspicion of endocarditis, have had at least a transthoracic echocardiography, 2 pairs of blood cultures, 3-month follow-up and in whom endocarditis diagnosis was finally rejected. All patients were classified by 2000 modified Duke, 2015 ESC and 2023 Duke-ISCVID, as though the endocarditis diagnosis had not been rejected.

resultsIn total, 130 patients' charts were analyzed. Mean age was 62 years, 84 (64.6%) were male, 39 (30.0%) had prosthetic cardiac valve or valve repair, 21 (16.2%) cardiac implanted electronic device, and 30 (23.1%) other cardiac conditions. Overall, 5, 2, and 5 patients were falsely classified as definite endocarditis with the 2000 modified Duke, 2015 ESC, and 2023 Duke-ISCVID classifications, respectively. The corresponding specificities were 96.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] [90.8%, 98.6%]), 98.5% (95% CI [93.9%, 99.7%]), and 96.2% (95% CI [90.8%, 98.6%]). The rates of possible endocarditis were of 38%, 35%, and 35% in the 3 classifications, respectively.

conclusionsThe 2023 Duke-ISCVID classification is highly specific for ruling out the diagnosis of definite infective endocarditis in patients who had been evaluated for IE.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesEndocarditisEndocarditis, BacterialEchocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies2023 Duke-ISCVID classificationdiagnostic toolsinfective endocarditisspecificity

Identifiers

PMID38330172
OpenAlexW4391641111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.