ArticlePloS one2024
MP2RAGE vs. MPRAGE surface-based morphometry in focal epilepsy.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of volume- and surface-based magnetic resonance imaging morphometry algorithms in the detection of focal cortical dysplasia.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Local brain volume reductions in patients with non-lesional epilepsy on 7T MRI.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Advanced neuroimaging in pediatric epilepsy surgery: state of the art and future perspectives.Neuroradiology · 2026Review
- Comparison of brain volumetry in patients with non-lesional epilepsy on 3 and 7 T MPRAGE.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In drug-resistant focal epilepsy, detecting epileptogenic lesions using MRI poses a critical diagnostic challenge. Here, we assessed the utility of MP2RAGE-a T1-weighted sequence with self-bias correcting properties commonly utilized in ultra-high field MRI-for the detection of epileptogenic lesions using a surface-based morphometry pipeline based on FreeSurfer, and compared it to the common approach using T1w MPRAGE, both at 3T. We included data from 32 patients with focal epilepsy (5 MRI-positive, 27 MRI-negative with lobar seizure onset hypotheses) and 94 healthy controls from two epilepsy centres. Surface-based morphological measures and intensities were extracted and evaluated in univariate GLM analyses as well as multivariate unsupervised 'novelty detection' machine learning procedures. The resulting prediction maps were analyzed over a range of possible thresholds using alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (AFROC) methodology with respect to the concordance with predefined lesion labels or hypotheses on epileptogenic zone location. We found that MP2RAGE performs at least comparable to MPRAGE and that especially analysis of MP2RAGE image intensities may provide additional diagnostic information. Secondly, we demonstrate that unsupervised novelty-detection machine learning approaches may be useful for the detection of epileptogenic lesions (maximum AFROC AUC 0.58) when there is only a limited lesional training set available. Third, we propose a statistical method of assessing lesion localization performance in MRI-negative patients with lobar hypotheses of the epileptogenic zone based on simulation of a random guessing process as null hypothesis. Based on our findings, it appears worthwhile to study similar surface-based morphometry approaches in ultra-high field MRI (≥ 7 T).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.