Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38329986›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2024

Machine perfusion of the liver and in vivo animal models: A systematic review of the preclinical research landscape.

Wenjia Liu, Decan Jiang, Mareike Schulz, Constança Figueiredo, Daniele Dondossola, Franziska Alexandra Meister, Dora Krisztina Tihanyi, Arianeb Mehrabi, Rene Hany Tolba, Zoltan Czigany and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A compact machine perfusion device for whole blood perfusion in isolated rat liver.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Wenjia LiuDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2911-3426
Decan JiangDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0535-9488
Mareike SchulzInstitute for Laboratory Animal Science and Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH, Aachen International University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1563-938X
Constança FigueiredoInstitute of Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Engineering, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Daniele DondossolaGeneral and Liver Transplant Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Franziska Alexandra MeisterDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Dora Krisztina TihanyiDoctoral School of Clinical Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Arianeb MehrabiDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rene Hany TolbaInstitute for Laboratory Animal Science and Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH, Aachen International University, Aachen, Germany.
Zoltan CziganyDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lisa ErnstInstitute for Laboratory Animal Science and Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH, Aachen International University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3808-4222
RWTH Aachen University · DEHeidelberg University · DEFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DESemmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine perfusion (MP) is often referred to as one of the most promising advancements in liver transplantation research of the last few decades, with various techniques and modalities being evaluated in preclinical studies using animal models. However, low scientific rigor and subpar reporting standards lead to limited reproducibility and translational potential, hindering progress. This pre-registered systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42021234667) aimed to provide a thematic overview of the preclinical research landscape on MP in liver transplantation using in vivo transplantation models and to explore methodological and reporting standards, using the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) score. In total 56 articles were included. Studies were evenly distributed across Asia, Europe, and the Americas. Porcine models were used in 57.1% of the studies, followed by rats (39.3%) and dogs (3.6%). In terms of graft type, 55.4% of the studies used donation after cardiac death grafts, while donation after brain death grafts accounted for 37.5%. Regarding MP modalities, the distribution was as follows: 41.5% of articles utilized hypothermic MP, 21.5% normothermic MP, 13.8% subnormothermic MP, and 16.9% utilized hypothermic oxygenated MP. The stringent documentation of ARRIVE elements concerning precise experimental execution, group size and selection, the choice of statistical methods, as well as adherence to the principles of the 3Rs, was notably lacking in the majority of publications, with less than 30% providing comprehensive details. Postoperative analgesia and antibiotics treatment were not documented in 82.1% of all included studies. None of the analyzed studies fully adhered to the ARRIVE Guidelines. In conclusion, the present study emphasizes the importance of adhering to reporting standards to promote reproducibility and adequate animal welfare in preclinical studies in machine perfusion. At the same time, it highlights a clear deficiency in this field, underscoring the need for further investigations into animal welfare-related topics.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationOrgan PreservationAnimalsDogsLiverPerfusionRatsReproducibility of ResultsSwine

Identifiers

PMID38329986
PMCPMC10852327
OpenAlexW4391641342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.