Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38329864›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2024

Decorrelation Time Mapping as an Analysis Tool for Nanobubble-Based Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.

Dana Wegierak, Michaela B Cooley, Reshani Perera, William J Wulftange, Umut A Gurkan, Michael C Kolios, Agata A Exner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Nanobubble Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: A Review.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dana Wegierak
Michaela B Cooley
Reshani Perera
William J Wulftange
Umut A Gurkan
Michael C Kolios
Agata A Exner
Case Western Reserve University · USToronto Metropolitan University · CA

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007250 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, ALEX YEE-CHEN · 1985 to 2023
$33.4M
Improved Detection of Prostate Cancer with Nanoparticle-based Ultrasound Contrast Agents Targeted to PSMAR01EB025741 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI James Peter Basilion, Agata A Exner · 2018 to 2026
$4.1M
Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandTL1TR000441 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$2.8M
Drug-Loaded Nanobubbles for Ultrasound Enhanced Delivery to Colon Cancer Liver MetastasisR01EB028144 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI EXNER, AGATA A · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
Microfluidic Technology for Concurrent Assessment of Red Blood Cell Adhesion and Deformability (Administrative Supplement)R42HL162214 · NHLBI · BIOCHIP LABS, INC. · PI FEDERICI, CHIARA, GURKAN, UMUT A. · 2022 to 2024
$2.1M
Standardized Monitoring of Cellular Adhesion to Improve Clinical Care in Sickle Cell DiseaseR01HL133574 · NHLBI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GURKAN, UMUT A., LITTLE, JANE · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Endothelialized microfluidic assays for emerging therapies in sickle cell diseaseR42HL160384 · NHLBI · BIOCHIP LABS, INC. · PI FEDERICI, CHIARA, GURKAN, UMUT A. · 2021 to 2023
$2.0M
CWRU- Cardiovascular Research Training ProgramT32HL134622 · NHLBI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI JAIN, MUKESH KUMAR, PROWELLER, AARON · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Microfluidic intact cell platform: A novel tool for oral cancer detectionR21CA253108 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GURKAN, UMUT A., WEINBERG, AARON · 2020 to 2020
$414k
Assessing vascular permeability and nanobubble extravasation with contrast-enhanced ultrasound imagingF30HL160111 · NHLBI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI COOLEY, MICHAELA · 2021 to 2023
$103k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000441NCI NIH HHS R21 CA253108NHLBI NIH HHS F30 HL160111NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133574NHLBI NIH HHS R42 HL160384NHLBI NIH HHS R42 HL162214NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL134622NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB025741NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028144NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanobubbles (NBs; ~100-500 nm diameter) are preclinical ultrasound (US) contrast agents that expand applications of contrast enhanced US (CEUS). Due to their sub-micron size, high particle density, and deformable shell, NBs in pathological states of heightened vascular permeability (e.g. in tumors) extravasate, enabling applications not possible with microbubbles (~1000-10,000 nm diameter). A method that can separate intravascular versus extravascular NB signal is needed as an imaging biomarker for improved tumor detection. We present a demonstration of decorrelation time (DT) mapping for enhanced tumor NB-CEUS imaging. In vitro models validated the sensitivity of DT to agent motion. Prostate cancer mouse models validated in vivo imaging potential and sensitivity to cancerous tissue. Our findings show that DT is inversely related to NB motion, offering enhanced detail of NB dynamics in tumors, and highlighting the heterogeneity of the tumor environment. Average DT was high in tumor regions (~9 s) compared to surrounding normal tissue (~1 s) with higher sensitivity to tumor tissue compared to other mapping techniques. Molecular NB targeting to tumors further extended DT (11 s) over non-targeted NBs (6 s), demonstrating sensitivity to NB adherence. From DT mapping of in vivo NB dynamics we demonstrate the heterogeneity of tumor tissue while quantifying extravascular NB kinetics and delineating intra-tumoral vasculature. This new NB-CEUS-based biomarker can be powerful in molecular US imaging, with improved sensitivity and specificity to diseased tissue and potential for use as an estimator of vascular permeability and the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumors.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaProstatic NeoplasmsUltrasonographyAnimalsCell Line, TumorHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiceMice, NudeMicrobubblesNanoparticlesPhantoms, ImagingContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID38329864
PMCPMC11234354
OpenAlexW4391661541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.