Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38329641›Full record

SynthesisActa neurologica Belgica2024

Clinical management of contrast-induced neurotoxicity: a systematic review.

Frederick P Mariajoseph, Jia Xi Chung, Leon T Lai, Justin Moore, Tony Goldschlager, Ronil V Chandra, Adrian Praeger, Lee-Anne Slater

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Frederick P MariajosephDepartment of Neurosurgery, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia. frederick.mariajoseph@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7210-0700
Jia Xi ChungDepartment of Surgery, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Leon T LaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Justin MooreDepartment of Neurosurgery, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Tony GoldschlagerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Ronil V ChandraMonash Imaging, Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia.
Adrian PraegerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Lee-Anne SlaterMonash Imaging, Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContrast-induced neurotoxicity (CIN) is an increasingly recognised complication following endovascular procedures utilising contrast. It remains poorly understood with heterogenous clinical management strategies. The aim of this review was to identify commonly employed treatments for CIN to enhance clinical decision making.

methodsA systematic search of Embase (1947-2022) and Medline (1946-2022) was conducted. Articles describing (i) patients with a clinical diagnosis of CIN, (ii) with radiological exclusion of other pathologies, (iii) detailed report of treatments, and (iv) discharge outcomes, were included. Data relating to demographics, procedure, symptoms, treatment and outcomes were extracted.

resultsA total of 73 patients were included, with a median age of 64 years. The most common procedures were cerebral angiography (42.5%) and coronary angiography (42.5%), and the median volume of contrast administered was 150 ml. The most common symptoms were cortical blindness (38.4%) and reduced consciousness (28.8%), and 84.9% of patients experienced complete resolution at the time of discharge. Management included intravenous fluids to dilute contrast in the cerebrovasculature (54.8%), corticosteroids to reduce blood-brain barrier damage (47.9%), antiseizure (16.4%) and sedative (16.4%) medications. Mannitol (13.7%) was also utilised to reduce cerebral oedema. Intensive care admission was required for 19.2% of patients. No statistically significant differences were observed between treatment and discharge outcomes.

conclusionsThe clinical management of CIN should be considered on a patient-by-patient basis, but may consist of aggressive fluid therapy alongside corticosteroids, as well as other supportive therapy as required. Further examination of CIN management is required to define best practice.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaNeurotoxicity SyndromesEndovascular ProceduresHumansMiddle AgedContrast MediaAdverse eventComplicationContrastEncephalopathyEndovascularManagementNeurotoxicityTreatment

Identifiers

PMID38329641
PMCPMC11266203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.