ArticleArchives of microbiology2024
A comprehensive investigation of the medicinal efficacy of antimicrobial fusion peptides expressed in probiotic bacteria for the treatment of pan drug-resistant (PDR) infections.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigation of the virulence, antibiotic resistance, and enterotoxin genes of methicillin-resistantIranian journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- A New Insight into Phage Combination Therapeutic Approaches Against Drug-Resistant Mixed Bacterial Infections.PHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present work aimed to examine the intracellular antibacterial efficacy of Recombinant Lactobacillus acidophilus/antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) Melittin and Alyteserin-1a, specifically targeting Gram-negative bacteria. The first assessment was to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of Recombinant L. acidophilus/AMPs versus Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. In addition, the researchers examined the in vitro viability and safety of AMPs generated by L. acidophilus. The experiments included exposing the AMPs to elevated temperatures, proteases, cationic salts at physiological levels, and specific pH settings. The safety aspect was evaluated using hemolytic analysis utilizing sheep erythrocytes; cytotoxicity assays employing cell lines, and experiments on beneficial gut lactobacilli. An experiment was done using a time-kill method to assess the intracellular antibacterial efficacy of Recombinant L. acidophilus/AMPs compared to pathogenic varieties in HEp-2 cells. Previous investigations have shown that the MBC levels of recombinant L. acidophilus/AMPs were consistently two to four times higher than the equivalent MIC values when evaluated versus Gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, the stability of the Recombinant L. acidophilus/AMPs showed variability when exposed to elevated temperatures (70 and 90 ℃), treated with protease enzymes (proteinase K, lysozyme), exposed to higher concentrations of physiological salts (150 mM NaCl and 2 mM MgCl
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.