Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38329573›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2024

Intravesical thermochemotherapy in the treatment of high-risk and very high-risk non-muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer: a single-arm study.

Antonín Brisuda, Jakub Horňák, Barbora Žemličková, Jaromír Háček, Marek Babjuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonín Brisuda2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, V Úvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic. antonin.brisuda@fnmotol.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5103-1358
Jakub Horňák2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, V Úvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
Barbora Žemličková2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, V Úvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
Jaromír Háček2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, V Úvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
Marek Babjuk2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, V Úvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIntravesical thermochemotherapy, also known as HIVEC (Hyperthermic Intra-VEsical Chemotherapy), represents an alternative adjuvant topical treatment for non-muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (NMIBC). High-risk (HR) and very HR tumors carry a substantial risk of recurrence and progression. In this study, we present our own results using HIVEC as an alternative to unavailable Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine in the treatment of such groups of patients.

methodsDuring the period of November 2014-June 2022, a total of 47 patients with HR and very HR NMIBC underwent treatment with HIVEC after transurethral resection. They were given an induction of 6 instillations with/without a maintenance. The aim was to evaluate the time to recurrence, event-free survival (recurrence or progression), as measured by Kaplan-Meier analysis, the effect of maintenance treatment and other factors on survival (log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression analysis), and complications.

resultsThe median follow-up for patients who did not experience an event was 32 months. The median time to HR (high grade and/or T1 tumor) recurrence in those who recurred was 15 months. The survival rate without HR recurrence at 12, 24, and 48 months was 84, 70, and 59%, respectively. Progression was detected in 10.6% of patients, which translated to 89% of patients living without progression after 24 months. Maintenance treatment (defined as more than six instillations) and presence of CIS significantly correlated with risk of HR recurrence (Hazard ratio 0.34 and 3.12, respectively). One female patient underwent salvage cystectomy due to contractory bladder, and 19.1% of patients experienced transient lower urinary tract symptoms.

conclusionBased on our experience, HIVEC represents an adequate and safe alternative treatment for HR and very HR NMIBC in situations where BCG is not available or radical cystectomy is not an option for the patient. However, high-quality data from prospective randomized studies are still lacking, and thus, thermochemotherapy should still be regarded as an experimental treatment modality.

Indexed as

Hyperthermia, InducedNeoplasm InvasivenessUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdministration, IntravesicalAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Transitional CellFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeAdjuvant instillationsIntravesical thermochemotherapyNon-muscle-invasive bladder cancerUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID38329573
PMCPMC11190016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.