Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38329558›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2024

The Implications of PrEP Use, Condom Use, and Partner Viral Load Status for Openness to Serodifferent Partnering Among US Sexual Minority Men (SMM).

David A Kalwicz, Sharanya Rao, Djordje X Modrakovic, Maria Cecilia Zea, John F Dovidio, Lisa A Eaton, Martin Holt, James MacGibbon, Myra A Zaheer, Alex Garner and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

David A KalwiczDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, George Washington University, 2013 H Street NW, Washington, DC, 20006, USA. dkalwicz@gwu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4616-3898
Sharanya RaoDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, George Washington University, 2013 H Street NW, Washington, DC, 20006, USA.
Djordje X ModrakovicDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, George Washington University, 2013 H Street NW, Washington, DC, 20006, USA.
Maria Cecilia ZeaDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, George Washington University, 2013 H Street NW, Washington, DC, 20006, USA.
John F DovidioDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Lisa A EatonDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Martin HoltCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
James MacGibbonCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Myra A ZaheerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, George Washington University, 2013 H Street NW, Washington, DC, 20006, USA.
Alex GarnerHornet Gay Social Network, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sarah K CalabreseDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, George Washington University, 2013 H Street NW, Washington, DC, 20006, USA.
George Washington University · USUNSW Sydney · AUUniversity of Connecticut · USYale University · US

Funding

The DC Cohort: A Longitudinal Population-Based Cohort Study of People Living with HIV in Washington, DCR24AI152598 · NIAID · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Amanda Derryck Castel, Marinella Temprosa · 2020 to 2026
$37.9M
SWG 2: Cure Research Scientific Working GroupP30AI117970 · NIAID · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Italo Mocchetti · 2015 to 2026
$29.6M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI117970NIAID NIH HHS R24 AI152598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PrEP has been reported to facilitate openness to serodifferent sexual partnerships among sexual minority men (SMM). However, other aspects of a sexual scenario likely come into play, including whether or not condoms are used and whether or not the partner living with HIV has an undetectable viral load. This online survey study evaluated the association between PrEP status and openness to serodifferent partnering, as well as the effects of various sexual scenario variables (condom use and partner's viral load) among 268 HIV-negative SMM in the US. Each participant reported their PrEP status and rated their openness to serodifferent partnering in four sexual scenarios, which varied by condom use (with/without) and partner viral load status (detectable/undetectable). Analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) were conducted to assess differences in openness to serodifferent partnering by PrEP status in each scenario, adjusting for background characteristics. A two-way repeated measures ANCOVA and a three-way mixed factorial ANCOVA, including PrEP status as a between-subjects variable, were also performed to assess the effects of condom use and partner viral load status on openness. Across all scenarios, current PrEP users expressed significantly greater openness to serodifferent partnering compared to participants who had never used PrEP. Current PrEP users were also more likely than former PrEP users to consider partnering with someone with an undetectable viral load without using condoms. Both PrEP users and PrEP-inexperienced individuals had greater openness to serodifferent partnering with a partner having an undetectable (vs. detectable) viral load, which was magnified by condom use among the latter.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesCondomsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersViral LoadCondom useHIVPre-exposure prophylaxisSerodifferent partneringSexual and gender minoritiesUndetectable = untransmittable (U = U)

Identifiers

PMID38329558
PMCPMC10999131
OpenAlexW4391645313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.