ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2024
Addressing the challenges of integrating care for perinatal depression in primary care in Nigeria.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification, Prevention, and Treatment of Perinatal Depression in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Narrative Review.Biological psychiatry · 2026Review
- Screening and detection of perinatal depression by non-physician primary healthcare workers in Nigeria.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Integrating Mental Health Services Into Perinatal Care: Challenges and Opportunities.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Models and key elements of integrated perinatal mental health care: A scoping review.PLOS mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis report provides the results of a task-shared approach for integrating care for perinatal depression (PND) within primary maternal and child healthcare (PMCH), including the factors that may facilitate or impede the process.
methodsThis hybrid implementation-effectiveness study guided by the Replicating Effective Programmes framework was conducted in 27 PMCH clinics in Ibadan, Nigeria. The primary implementation outcome was change in the identification rates of PND by primary health care workers (PHCW) while the primary effectiveness outcome was the difference in symptom remission (EPDS score ≤ 5) 6 months postpartum. Outcome measures were compared between two cohorts of pregnant women, one recruited before and the other after training PHCW to identify and treat PND. Barriers and facilitators were explored in qualitative interviews.
resultsIdentification of PND improved from 1.4% before to 17.4% after training; post-training rate was significantly higher in clinics where PHCW routinely screened using the 2-item patient health questionnaire (24.8%) compared to non-screening clinics (5.6%). At 6-months postpartum, 60% of cohort one experienced remission from depression, compared to 56.5% cohort two [OR-0.9 (95%CI-0.6, 1.3) p = 0.58]. Identified facilitators for successful integration included existence of policy specifying mental health as a component of PHC, use of screening to aid identification and supportive supervision, while barriers included language and cultural attitudes towards mental health and human resource constraints. PHCW were able to make adaptations to address these barriers.
conclusionsSuccessful implementation of task-shared care for perinatal depression requires addressing staff shortages and adopting strategies that can improve identification by non-specialist providers.
trial registrationThis study was retrospectively registered 03 Dec 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN94230307 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
38329495What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.