Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38329484›Full record

ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Salvage lymphadenectomy for recurrent prostate cancer].

Thomas Horn, Flemming Lischewski, Jürgen E Gschwend

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas HornKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Fakultät für Medizin, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland. t.horn@tum.de.
Flemming LischewskiKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Fakultät für Medizin, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
Jürgen E GschwendKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Fakultät für Medizin, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based positron emission tomography (PET) imaging allows early detection of metastases in patients with biochemical recurrence. Salvage lymphadenectomy became a widely used method of metastasis-directed treatment. Retrospective analyses show that a low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value and presence of no more than two affected lymph nodes within the pelvis are factors associated with a good outcome. In all, 40-80% of patients achieve a complete biochemical response with a mean time without biochemical recurrence of 8 months and a prolonged treatment-free interval. About 10% of patients with a complete biochemical response will live without recurrence after 10 years. The utilization of PSMA-radioguided surgery increases the likelihood of intraoperative detection of suspicious affected lymph nodes. Complications can mostly be avoided by prudent patient selection and surgical expertise.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatic NeoplasmsHumansLymph Node ExcisionMaleProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenLymph node dissectionPSAPSMA-PET/CTRadical prostatectomyRadioguided surgery

Identifiers

PMID38329484
OpenAlexW4391654275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.