ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2024
Post-disclosure distress among racial and ethnic groups in a preclinical AD trial.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Just Semantics? How Diagnostic Criteria Influence Physician-Patient Narratives in Alzheimer's Disease.Neuro-degenerative diseases · 2026Article
- Long-term impact of disclosing amyloid PET results to individuals with subjective cognitive decline.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
- Reasons for undergoing amyloid imaging among diverse enrollees in the A4 study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Post-disclosure distress among racial and ethnic groups in a preclinical AD trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTrialists need a thorough understanding of whether reactions to Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker information differ among racial and ethnic groups in preclinical AD trials.
methodsWe used data from the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's Disease Study to analyze cognitively unimpaired participants' responses on the Impact of Event Scale (IES) 24 to 72 hours after amyloid disclosure. We fit a linear regression model to test whether mean IES scores differed among participants from specific racial and ethnic groups. We considered potential effect modification by amyloid status.
resultsReactions to disclosure did not significantly differ among participant groups based on self-reported race and ethnicity. Although the results were not significant when stratified by amyloid status, all racial and ethnic groups except for participants self-reporting Hispanic/Latino ethnicity were observed to have higher mean IES in the elevated amyloid group. DISCUSSION: These results support continued use of current disclosure methods in preclinical AD trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.