ArticleHealth science reports2024
Clinical and historical features of cesarean scar pregnancies in a tertiary hospital with a high rate of cesarean section: A case-control survey.
Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heterotopic Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Diagnosis, Management and Prognosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study of Ultrasound-Guided Suction Evacuation From Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare medical condition accounting for 1:2000 of all pregnancies with prior history of cesarean deliveries (CS). As the rate of CS is increasing worldwide, it is important to know the nature of CSP and its complications. Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, we evaluated 264 pregnant women; 86 cases with ultra-sonographic findings of CSP and 178 controls: normal pregnancies with gestational age less than 12 weeks. The variables consisted of demographic characteristics, the features and causes of the prior CS, the time distance to the current pregnancy, sonographic features, and the final management. All data analyzed using SPSS version 21. Results: There was a significant difference between the two study groups regarding to parity, abortions and D&Cs ( Conclusions: Based on our findings, advanced maternal age, positive history of abortion, the elective type of the former CS, and short time intervals between previous CS and current pregnancy are the main risk factors of CSP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.