ArticleJPRAS open2024
The internet and various social media platforms as source of information to patients with wounds in Kenya.
Article in JPRAS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The internet has led to the realization that the world is a global village. Due to technological advancements, anyone can access the internet and various video sharing platforms and in turn, get access to or share information across the world. One of the most sought-after critical pieces of information on the internet, as well as social media platforms, is information regarding wounds. Objective: To determine the views of patients with chronic wounds regarding the internet and other social media platforms as a source of information regarding wounds. Methodology: A descriptive prospective study covering the period between November 1, 2022, and January 30, 2023. All patients with chronic wounds presenting in the plastic outpatient clinic, together with patients presenting themselves in the wound clinic at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH) during this period, were informed about the study and asked to participate. After consenting, they were then required to sign an informed consent form after agreeing to participate. Data collection was done through interviews and filled out in structured questionnaires. Data points included demographics, information on internet use, and interaction with the various social media platforms. Results: 83.4% of the participants were of the opinion that the contents shared were done so by professionals, compared to 12.5% who indicated that the owners or uploaders of the contents were laymen. 2.6% and 1.5%, on the other hand, opined that the owners or uploaders of the contents were unknown and difficult to tell, respectively. Discussion: The participants in the current study felt that some aspects regarding content on wounds that is shared on the internet as well as other social media platforms would need further improvement. Such areas included information regarding wound dressing concepts, the etiology and pathophysiology of wounds, complications of wounds, and wound pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.