ArticleToxicology reports2024
Oral sub-chronic toxicity of fingerroot (
Article in Toxicology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Combination Therapy for Counteracting Dysregulated Genes in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Contribution-Aware Metaheuristic for Drug Repurposing.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Inhibitory Effect ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Unveiling the anticancer potential of Pinostrobin: mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic insights, and therapeutic prospects.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Traditional usages, chemical metabolites, pharmacological activities, and pharmacokinetics ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Transcriptome analysis reveals a role of FOXO3 in antileukemia/lymphoma properties of panduratin A.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Oral Bioavailability, Tissue Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion of Panduratin A fromDrug design, development and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: We enhanced the water solubility of a fingerroot extract by formulating it with cyclodextrin, containing panduratin A (29% w/w) and pinostrobin (32% w/w). This formulation was administered to male and female Wistar rats at doses of 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg/day for a duration of 90 days. Additionally, two recovery groups, comprising a control group and a high-dose group, were designated for a 14-day observation period to assess the persistence and reversibility of potential adverse effects. Throughout the experiment, we performed clinical and health observations, followed by hematological testing, clinical biochemistry analysis, necropsy examination, and histopathological evaluation at the end of the experiment. Results: The administration of the fingerroot extract formulation at doses of 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg/day did not result in mortality or clinical signs of toxicity. No clinically significant findings were associated with the oral administration of the fingerroot extract formulation. Conclusion: The fingerroot extract formulation showed no serious adverse effects at doses up to 100 mg/kg/day in Wistar rats under the experimental condition. Consequently, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be 100 mg/kg/day. This finding contributes significance for future developments involving fingerroot extract in herbal medicinal products targeting chronic inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.