Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38328717›Full record

ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2023

Adherence to dermatologic treatment: A retrospective cross-sectional study on geriatric patients.

Sila Kilic Sayar, Gizem Pinar Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sila Kilic SayarDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Bahcesehir University Faculty of Medicine, Goztepe Medical Park Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Gizem Pinar SunDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Health Sciences, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWith the prolongation of the average life expectancy worldwide, diseases including dermatological disorders of the elderly are gaining importance. The presence of comorbidities in this age group may affect the treatment strategies; compliance with follow-up and adherence to medication can be poor. The aim of this study is to evaluate the dermatological disorders of patients aged 65 and over and determine their adherence to dermatologic treatment.

methodsA retrospective and cross-sectional study was conducted on patients aged 65 and over applied to a single tertiary dermatology clinic between April 2021 and April 2022. Diagnoses were that clinical and diagnostic tests were performed when only necessary.

resultsA total of 207 admissions to the dermatology clinic by 135 patients were evaluated. Eczema (23.05%) and infections (25.2%) were the most common dermatological diagnoses. The percentage of patients with precancerous and cancerous lesions was 11.9%. Among 123 patients who need at least a follow-up visit, only 37 patients (30.1%) applied for follow-up as advised, and medicines were taken regularly by 23 of these patients (62.2%). Compliance with follow-up was lower among men (OR 0.365, 95% CI 0.160-0.834, and p=0.02) and patients who were treated only with local therapy agents (OR 0.345, 95% CI 0.138-0.863, and p=0.20).

conclusionEczema and infections were the most common dermatological diagnoses among geriatric patients in the present study. The majority of geriatric patients with skin conditions were not applying for follow-up visits. Women and patients treated with systemic therapy agents were more compliant. The prevalence of basal cell carcinoma was not low, and this emphasizes the importance of a careful dermatological examination regardless of primary complaint in this age group.

Indexed as

Basal cell carcinomaeczemageriatricskin disorderstreatment

Identifiers

PMID38328717
PMCPMC10846571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.