Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38328705›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Untargeted metabolomics profiling of oat (

Megan S Hager, Megan L Hofland, Andrea C Varella, Brian Bothner, Hikmet Budak, David K Weaver

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Megan S HagerDepartment of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Megan L HoflandWheat Stem Sawfly Laboratory, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Andrea C VarellaCorteva Agriscience™, Woodstock Research and Development Centre, Tavistock, ON, Canada.
Brian BothnerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Hikmet BudakDepartment of Agriculture, Arizona Western College, Yuma, AZ, United States.
David K WeaverWheat Stem Sawfly Laboratory, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Montana State University · USArizona Western College · US

Funding

Research Core (Developmental Research Project Program)P20GM103474 · NIGMS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI Jeffrey Good · 2012 to 2026
$60.0M
Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometer for MetabolomicsS10OD028650 · OD · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI BOTHNER, BRIAN P · 2020 to 2020
$599k
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103474NIH HHS S10 OD028650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Wheat stem sawfly (WSS), Cephus cinctus Norton, is a major pest of common bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and other cultivated cereals in North America. Planting of cultivars with solid stems has been the primary management strategy to prevent yield loss due to WSS infestation, however expression of this phenotype can vary depending on environmental conditions and solid stems hinder biological control of WSS via braconid parasitoids Bracon cephi (Gahan) and Bracon lissogaster Muesebeck. In the hollow stems of oat (Avena sativa L.), WSS larvae experience 100% mortality before they reach late instars, but the mechanisms for this observed resistance have not been characterized. Objective: The objective of this study was to explore additional sources of resistance outside of the historic solid stem phenotype. Methods: Here, we use an untargeted metabolomics approach to examine the response of the metabolome of two cultivars of oat and four cultivars of spring wheat to infestation by WSS. Using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), differentially expressed metabolites were identified between oat and wheat which were associated with the phenylpropanoid pathway, phospholipid biosynthesis and signaling, the salicylic acid signaling pathway, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) degradation, and biosynthesis of 1,4-benzoxazin-3-ones (Bxs). Several phospho- and galacto- lipids were found in higher abundance in oat, and with the exception of early stem solidness cultivar Conan, both species experienced a decrease in abundance once infested. In all wheat cultivars except Conan, an increase in abundance was observed for Bxs HMDBOA-glc and DIBOA-β-D-glucoside after infestation, indicating that this pathway is involved in wheat response to infestation in both solid and hollow stemmed cultivars. Differences between species in compounds involved in IAA biosynthesis, degradation and inactivation suggest that wheat may respond to infestation by inactivating IAA or altering the IAA pool in stem tissue. Conclusion: We propose that the species differences found here likely affect the survival of WSS larvae and may also be associated with differences in stem architecture at the molecular level. Our findings suggest pathways to focus on for future studies in elucidating plant response to WSS infestation.

Indexed as

Avena sativahost plant resistanceinsect feedingmetabolomicsTriticum aestivumwheat stem sawfly

Identifiers

PMID38328705
PMCPMC10848266
OpenAlexW4391169777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.