Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38328674›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Algorithm for predicting valvular heart disease from heart sounds in an unselected cohort.

Per Niklas Waaler, Hasse Melbye, Henrik Schirmer, Markus Kreutzer Johnsen, Tom Donnem, Johan Ravn, Stian Andersen, Anne Herefoss Davidsen, Juan Carlos Aviles Solis, Michael Stylidis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Per Niklas WaalerDepartment of Computer Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Hasse MelbyeGeneral Practice Research Unit, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Henrik SchirmerDepartment of Cardiology, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Markus Kreutzer JohnsenMedsensio AS, Oslo, Norway.
Tom DonnemDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Johan RavnMedsensio AS, Oslo, Norway.
Stian AndersenGeneral Practice Research Unit, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Anne Herefoss DavidsenGeneral Practice Research Unit, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Juan Carlos Aviles SolisGeneral Practice Research Unit, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Michael StylidisSørbyen Legesenter, Tromsø, Norway.
Lars Ailo BongoDepartment of Computer Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess the ability of state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms to detect valvular heart disease (VHD) from digital heart sound recordings in a general population that includes asymptomatic cases and intermediate stages of disease progression. Methods: We trained a recurrent neural network to predict murmurs from heart sound audio using annotated recordings collected with digital stethoscopes from four auscultation positions in 2,124 participants from the Tromsø7 study. The predicted murmurs were used to predict VHD as determined by echocardiography. Results: The presence of aortic stenosis (AS) was detected with a sensitivity of 90.9%, a specificity of 94.5%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.979 (CI: 0.963-0.995). At least moderate AS was detected with an AUC of 0.993 (CI: 0.989-0.997). Moderate or greater aortic and mitral regurgitation (AR and MR) were predicted with AUC values of 0.634 (CI: 0.565-703) and 0.549 (CI: 0.506-0.593), respectively, which increased to 0.766 and 0.677 when clinical variables were added as predictors. The AUC for predicting symptomatic cases was higher for AR and MR, 0.756 and 0.711, respectively. Screening jointly for symptomatic regurgitation or presence of stenosis resulted in an AUC of 0.86, with 97.7% of AS cases ( Conclusions: The algorithm demonstrated excellent performance in detecting AS in a general cohort, surpassing observations from similar studies on selected cohorts. The detection of AR and MR based on HS audio was poor, but accuracy was considerably higher for symptomatic cases, and the inclusion of clinical variables improved the performance of the model significantly.

Indexed as

aortic stenosisgeneral populationheart soundsmachine learningmurmurscreeningvalvular heart disease

Identifiers

PMID38328674
PMCPMC10847556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.