Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38328666›Full record

ArticleZooKeys2023

Distribution and diversity of fishes and lampreys in Transylvania (Romania): a complete survey and suggestions for new protected areas.

András Attila Nagy, Nándor Erős, István Imecs, Gábor Bóné, Attila Fülöp, Péter László Pap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ZooKeys, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

András Attila NagyEvolutionary Ecology Group, 3B Centre for Systems Biology, Biodiversity and Bioresources, Hungarian Department of Biology and Ecology, Babeş-Bolyai University, Clinicilor street 5-7, RO-400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Nándor ErősEvolutionary Ecology Group, 3B Centre for Systems Biology, Biodiversity and Bioresources, Hungarian Department of Biology and Ecology, Babeş-Bolyai University, Clinicilor street 5-7, RO-400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8921-482X
István ImecsDepartment of Freshwater Fish Ecology, Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Sciences, H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary.
Gábor BónéMilvus Group Bird and Nature Protection Association, Crinului street 22, RO-540343 Târgu Mureș, Romania.
Attila FülöpEvolutionary Ecology Group, 3B Centre for Systems Biology, Biodiversity and Bioresources, Hungarian Department of Biology and Ecology, Babeş-Bolyai University, Clinicilor street 5-7, RO-400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5337-336X
Péter László PapEvolutionary Ecology Group, 3B Centre for Systems Biology, Biodiversity and Bioresources, Hungarian Department of Biology and Ecology, Babeş-Bolyai University, Clinicilor street 5-7, RO-400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3659-7684

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freshwater fishes are in a serious state of decline across the world, making them one of the most threatened groups of vertebrates. The Danube River catchment area in Europe holds the richest freshwater fish community, but our knowledge of the current distribution of these species is limited. Transylvania, the largest region of Romania, is one of the important tributaries of the Danube, from where 77 fish and two lamprey species were recorded until now. Despite this large diversity of freshwater fishes, there is a lack of systematic survey of the fish fauna in this region for the past 50 years. In this study, we present data on the occurrence and distribution of fishes and lampreys collected in Transylvania from 2007 to 2022. This data covers 43% of Romania's surface and includes all major rivers from Transylvania. 65 species of fish and three species of lampreys are recorded, and an additional nine fish species are also reported based on information from competent people. Of the 77 fish and lamprey species recorded 19 (24.7%) are non-native, although their relative abundance was low (5.1%) compared to other similar regions in Europe. The first records of

Indexed as

Conservationfish distributionfreshwater ichthyofaunaNatura 2000non-native species

Identifiers

PMID38328666
PMCPMC10848864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.