ReviewCancer pathogenesis and therapy2023
Incidence rate and treatment strategy of immune checkpoint inhibitor mediated hepatotoxicity: A systematic review.
Review in Cancer pathogenesis and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Study from Vietnam.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-induced Hepatitis, an Emerging Issue in Precision Cancer Therapy Era: A Narrative Literature Review.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2026Review
- Subacute liver failure caused by immunotherapy in a patient with gastric cancer was improved after multimodal treatment with artificial liver combined with liver-protective drugs: a case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Hepatotoxicity in Cancer Immunotherapy: Diagnosis, Management, and Future Perspectives.Cancers · 2024Review
- Multiorgan Toxicity from Dual Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy, Resulting in a Complete Response-A Case Report.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A hepatic adverse event (HAE) is defined as a liver injury that occurs following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration in oncology Patients. Immune-mediated hepatotoxicity (IMH) is a type of HAE directly caused by ICI and is associated with immune system hyperactivation. HAE incidence varies across different clinical studies. This study aimed to explore the risk factors of HAE and establish a personalized IMH treatment strategy. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ICIs and case reports related to IMH were collected and summarized separately. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (version 5.0), whereas correlation analysis and linear regression were performed using SPSS (version 24.0) to evaluate any correlations between the two variables. Results: Overall, 36 RCTs containing 18,515 patients and 39 case reports met our inclusion criteria. The ICI administration increased the HAE risk (risk ratio [RR] = 1.40) as well as severe HAE (RR = 2.55). The overall HAE incidence and severe incidence were about 15.3% and 4.3%, respectively. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors have a higher incidence of HAE than programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. Finally, we found a positive correlation between the onset time of IMH and the recovery time of liver injury. Conclusions: ICI administration increased the incidence risk of HAE, especially in patients treated with CTLA-4 inhibitors. Regarding IMH treatment, the glucocorticoid dosage must be individually reduced according to the severity and onset time of HAE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.