Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38328593›Full record

ArticleJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health2024

Evidence-Based Communication to Increase Melanoma Knowledge and Skin Checks.

Ariel Nadratowski, Brittany Shoots-Reinhard, Autumn Shafer, Jerusha Detweiler-Bedell, Brian Detweiler-Bedell, Sancy Leachman, Ellen Peters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ariel NadratowskiCenter for Science Communication Research, School of Journalism and Communication, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Brittany Shoots-ReinhardCenter for Science Communication Research, School of Journalism and Communication, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Autumn ShaferCenter for Science Communication Research, School of Journalism and Communication, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Jerusha Detweiler-BedellDepartment of Psychology, Lewis & Clark College, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Brian Detweiler-BedellDepartment of Psychology, Lewis & Clark College, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Sancy LeachmanDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Ellen PetersCenter for Science Communication Research, School of Journalism and Communication, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rates of melanoma-the deadliest form of skin cancer-have increased. Early detection can save lives, and patients have a critical role to play in checking their skin. We aim to identify health communication messages that best educate the public and increase intentions toward skin checks. After viewing messages intended to increase melanoma knowledge, participants correctly identified a greater proportion (74.6 vs 70.4%) of moles (mean number = 17.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 17.5-18.3 vs 16.9, 95% CI = 16.6-17.3;

Indexed as

Health communicationKnowledgeMelanomaSelf-efficacySocial media

Identifiers

PMID38328593
PMCPMC10847376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.