Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38328572›Full record

ReviewRoyal Society open science2024

Does the settling column method underestimate phytoplankton sinking speeds?

Kevin T Du Clos, Brad J Gemmell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kevin T Du ClosDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3017-7777
Brad J GemmellDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9031-6591

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytoplankton sinking is a major component of vertical ocean carbon and nutrient fluxes, and sinking is an integral component of phytoplankton biology and ecology. Much of our understanding of phytoplankton sinking derives from the settling column method (SETCOL) in which sinking speeds are calculated from the proportion of cells reaching the bottom of a water-filled column after a set time. Video-based methods are a recent alternative to SETCOL in which sinking speeds are measured by tracking the movement of individual cells in a salinity-stratified water column. In this study, we present the results of a meta-analysis showing that SETCOL produces significantly and consistently lower sinking speeds than the video method. Next, we perform a particle image velocimetry analysis, which shows that the observed discrepancy in sinking speeds between the two methods can probably be explained by weak convection currents in the SETCOLs. Finally, we discuss the implications of these results for the interpretation of past and future phytoplankton sinking speed measurements and models that rely on those measurements.

Indexed as

diatommethodsphytoplanktonSETCOL‌settling column methodsinking

Identifiers

PMID38328572
PMCPMC10846949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.