ArticleJournal of inflammation research2024
Clinical Implications of Naples Prognostic Score for Patients with Resected Cholangiocarcinoma: A Real-World Experience.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic value of the pretreatment Naples prognostic score in gastrointestinal cancer patients: an updated meta-analysis with 28 studies.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of Naples prognostic score on cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients: a multicenter study.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Association of immunonutritional indicators with all-cause mortality in adult stroke patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Prognostic value of Naples Prognostic Score in locally advanced cervical cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Article
- The Naples Prognostic Score Exerts a Significant Impact on the Prognosis of Patients Diagnosed with External Auditory Canal Carcinoma After Surgery.Cancer management and research · 2025Article
- Development of a Prognostic Nomogram Incorporating the Naples Prognostic Score for Postoperative Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Modified Naples Prognostic Score for Postoperative Prognostic Stratification in Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Clinical significance of the modified Naples prognostic score in patients with stage II-III colon cancer undergoing curative resection: a retrospective study from the real world.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Prognostic value of the Naples Prognostic Score in adult chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: NHANES 2005-2018.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The Nutritional Prognostic Score (NPS) is a composite indicator that effectively reflects the preoperative nutritional and inflammation status of patients. Its prognostic value has been extensively confirmed in various types of tumors. Our study aims to investigate the clinical implications of the NPS in the postoperative patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Patients and Methods: Data on clinicopathological characteristics were collected from CCA patients who underwent radical surgery between 2014 and 2019 at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. NPS was calculated using relevant indicators to categorize the patients, and association of NPS with clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes were analyzed. To assess differences in survival rates between different groups, we utilized the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent prognostic risk factors were identified by Cox regression analysis. A CONomogram was created, and its accuracy in survival prediction was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Independent verification was conducted in the validation group. Results: For this study, a cohort of 232 patients was enlisted and subsequently divided into training group (N=162) and validation group (N=70). An evident correlation was detected between NPS and preoperative malnutrition. Patients with higher NPS exhibited a worse overall survival (OS), with 5-year OS rates of 79.1%, 33.1%, and 10.6%. Multivariate analysis revealed that NPS was an independent risk factor for OS in resected CCA patients ( Conclusion: The NPS was identified as a significant risk factor that impacts the prognosis of patients with resected CCA. In order to improve prognosis management, the NPS-based Nomogram has been demonstrated to be a precise and efficient tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.