Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38328531›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2024

A 70° Arthroscope Provides Better Visualization of the Medial Side of the Elbow Than a 30° Arthroscope.

Valerio Monteleone, Valeria Vismara, Simone Cassin, Francesco Luceri, Carlo Zaolino, Chandan Kulkarni, Pietro Simone Randelli, Paolo Arrigoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Navigation-Assisted Extra-articular Approach for Curettage of a Subchondral Bone Cyst of the Humeral Trochlea.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Valerio MonteleoneClinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy.
Valeria VismaraScuola Di Specializzazione in Ortopedia e Traumatologia Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Simone CassinScuola Di Specializzazione in Ortopedia e Traumatologia Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Francesco LuceriClinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy.
Carlo ZaolinoClinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy.
Chandan KulkarniClinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy.
Pietro Simone RandelliClinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy.
Paolo ArrigoniClinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess and quantify the improvement in visualization of humeral insertion of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) using a 70° scope compared with a 30° scope during elbow arthroscopy. Methods: Twenty patients undergoing elbow arthroscopy for different pathologic conditions were enrolled in this single-center study. Visualization of the medial gutter of the elbow was evaluated by using both the 70° and the 30°scope. During the procedure, a needle was inserted at 45° with respect to the axis of the forearm, directed toward the intra-articular humeral emergence of the MCL. Four areas were established: the body (Z1), the lanceolate part (Z2), the tip of the needle (Z3), and the medial portion of the trochlea (Z4). The visible areas during arthroscopy using 2 different scopes were collected. Results: The 70° scope allowed the detection of the first 3 areas in all patients (Z1, Z2, and Z3) and the visualization of the last area (Z4) in 19 patients (95%). On the other hand, the 30° scope allowed the detection of Z1 in 85% of patients, Z2 in 60% of patients, and Z3 in only 5% of patients. The medial portion of the trochlea was never visualized with the 30° scope. These findings were statistically significant. Conclusions: The 70° scope improves visualization of the medial elbow compartment during elbow arthroscopy compared to the 30° scope, enhancing the extent of joint visualization and potentially permitting the detection of otherwise missed injuries in the difficult-to-reach areas of the joint. Level of Evidence: Level II, diagnostic, prospective, cohort study.

Identifiers

PMID38328531
PMCPMC10844937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.