ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2024
Detection of Tumor DNA in Bronchoscopic Fluids in Peripheral NSCLC: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell-free tumour DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage: a proof of concept study.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: DNA genotyping from plasma is a useful tool for molecular characterization of NSCLC. Nevertheless, the false-negative rate justifies the development of methods with higher sensitivity, especially in difficult-to-reach peripheral lung tumors. Methods: We aimed at comparing molecular analysis from the supernatant of guide sheath flush fluid collected during radial-EndoBronchial UltraSound (r-EBUS) bronchoscopy with plasma sampling and tumor biopsies in patients with peripheral NSCLC. The DNA was genotyped using high-throughput sequencing or the COBAS mutation test. There were 65 patients with peripheral lung tumors subjected to concomitant sampling of guide sheath flush supernatant, plasma tumor DNA, and tumor biopsy and cytology using r-EBUS. There were 33 patients (including 24 newly diagnosed with having NSCLC) with an identifiable tumor mutation in the primary lesion selected for the comparative analysis. Results: Guide sheath flush-based genotyping yielded a mutation detection rate of 61.8% (17 of 24 mutated Conclusion: The detection of tumor DNA in the supernatant of guide sheath flush fluid collected during r-EBUS bronchoscopy represents a sensitive and complementary method for genotyping NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.