Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38328471›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2023

Artificial neural network models: implementation of functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based spontaneous lie detection in an interactive scenario.

M Raheel Bhutta, Muhammad Umair Ali, Amad Zafar, Kwang Su Kim, Jong Hyuk Byun, Seung Won Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. "Kill the Enemy": Can Violence be Learned in Children by Activating Mirror Neurons Through Video Games?Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M Raheel Bhutta *Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of UTAH Asia Campus, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Muhammad Umair Ali *Department of Intelligent Mechatronics Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Amad ZafarDepartment of Intelligent Mechatronics Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kwang Su KimDepartment of Scientific Computing, Pukyong National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Jong Hyuk ByunDepartment of Mathematics and Institute of Mathematical Science, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Seung Won LeeDepartment of Precision Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deception is an inevitable occurrence in daily life. Various methods have been used to understand the mechanisms underlying brain deception. Moreover, numerous efforts have been undertaken to detect deception and truth-telling. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has great potential for neurological applications compared with other state-of-the-art methods. Therefore, an fNIRS-based spontaneous lie detection model was used in the present study. We interviewed 10 healthy subjects to identify deception using the fNIRS system. A card game frequently referred to as a bluff or cheat was introduced. This game was selected because its rules are ideal for testing our hypotheses. The optical probe of the fNIRS was placed on the subject's forehead, and we acquired optical density signals, which were then converted into oxy-hemoglobin and deoxy-hemoglobin signals using the Modified Beer-Lambert law. The oxy-hemoglobin signal was preprocessed to eliminate noise. In this study, we proposed three artificial neural networks inspired by deep learning models, including AlexNet, ResNet, and GoogleNet, to classify deception and truth-telling. The proposed models achieved accuracies of 88.5%, 88.0%, and 90.0%, respectively. These proposed models were compared with other classification models, including k-nearest neighbor, linear support vector machines (SVM), quadratic SVM, cubic SVM, simple decision trees, and complex decision trees. These comparisons showed that the proposed models performed better than the other state-of-the-art methods.

Indexed as

classificationdeceptiondeep learning algorithmfunctional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)spontaneous lie detection

Identifiers

PMID38328471
PMCPMC10848249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.