Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38328437›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2023

Twenty questions from the surgeon to the radiologist to better plan an open partial horizontal laryngectomy.

Erika Crosetti, Giovanni Succo, Silvia Sapino, Ilaria Bertotto, Stefano Cirillo, Massimo Petracchini, Gabriele Fondello, Giulia Arrigoni, Martina Tascone, Cesare Piazza and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Clinical-pathological T-stage discrepancy in OPHL: impact on oncologic outcomes.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Erika CrosettiHead and Neck Cancer Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Giovanni SuccoOncology Department, University of Turin, Head and Neck Cancer Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Silvia SapinoHead and Neck Cancer Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Ilaria BertottoRadiology Service, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Candiolo, Italy.
Stefano CirilloRadiology Service, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Massimo PetracchiniRadiology Service, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Gabriele FondelloRadiology Service, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Giulia ArrigoniHead and Neck Cancer Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Martina TasconeHead and Neck Cancer Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Cesare PiazzaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, School of Medicine, Brescia, Italy.
Davide FarinaDepartment of Radiology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Marco RavanelliDepartment of Radiology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open partial horizontal laryngectomies (OPHLs) represent a valuable therapeutic option for tumors of the intermediate T-category and, in selected cases, for locally advanced tumors with low-volume extra-laryngeal extension. The eligibility of patients treated with this type of surgery has increased with the introduction of the modular approach to OPHL planning. This strategy follows the introduction of the classification proposed by the European Laryngological Society, based on the extent of horizontal resection. Optimization of the selection is the result of a meticulous work-up process involving close cooperation between experienced surgeons and radiologists, followed by final quality control by pathologists. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are study methods whose pearls and pitfalls are well known, especially when performed at a high level of expertise. In this paper, based on the experience of two high-volume centers, a checklist of 20 questions addressed by the surgeon to the radiologist before planning an OPHL was proposed. Considerations regarding case selection are reported for each of the questioned parameters. A very simple question-and-answer process is easy to understand and mainly addressed by less experienced colleagues who wish to increase their knowledge and skills in performing this type of surgery.

Indexed as

computerized tomographyimaginglaryngeal cancermagnetic resonance imagingOPHLpartial laryngectomy

Identifiers

PMID38328437
PMCPMC10847842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.