Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38328276›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2024

Effects on voice hearing distress and social functioning of unguided application of a smartphone app - A randomized controlled trial.

Alyssa Jongeneel, Philippe Delespaul, Nynke Tromp, Dorien Scheffers, Berber van der Vleugel, Paul de Bont, Martijn Kikkert, Carlos F Croes, Anton B P Staring, Heleen Riper and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alyssa JongeneelDepartment of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Philippe DelespaulSchool of MentalHealth and NeuroSciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Nynke TrompDepartment of Industrial Design, Delft University of Technology, Landbergstraat 15, 2628 CE Delft, Netherlands.
Dorien ScheffersResearch Centre, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, Zoutkeetsingel 40, 2512 HN Den Haag, Netherlands.
Berber van der VleugelCommunity Mental Health Service, GGZ Noord-Holland Noord, Alkmaar, Netherlands.
Paul de BontDepartment of Early Intervention Psychosis, Mental Health Organisation GGZ Oost Brabant, Land van Cuijck en Noord Limburg, Boxmeer, Netherlands.
Martijn KikkertArkin Research, Arkin, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Carlos F CroesGGz Centraal Mental Health Institution, Amersfoort, Netherlands.
Anton B P StaringAltrecht Psychiatric Institution, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Heleen RiperDepartment of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Mark van der GaagDepartment of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands.
David van den BergDepartment of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Temstem is a smartphone app developed with and for clinical voice hearing individuals with the aim to reduce their voice hearing distress and improve social functioning. Methods: A randomized controlled trial with adult outpatients suffering from distressing and frequent auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) was conducted. Participants were randomized to unguided 'Temstem+AVH monitoring' or unguided 'AVH monitoring only' (control condition). Assessments were performed at baseline, post-intervention (week 5-6), and follow-up (week 9-10). Primary outcomes were voice hearing distress and social functioning, as measured with Experience Sampling Method (ESM), consisting of multiple daily questionnaires during six days. In addition, voices and mood were self-monitored with help of a daily reflective questionnaire. Analyses were linear regression models (intention-to-treat). Results: 44 Participants were allocated to Temstem and 45 to the control condition. No significant differences between the groups were found on both primary outcomes. Conclusion: Our results do not support the effectiveness of stand-alone use of Temstem versus symptom monitoring on voice hearing distress or social functioning in voice hearing individuals. In order to potentially improve effectiveness of an mHealth tool in a population of people with frequent and distressing voices, we recommend to involve persons with lived experience in all stages of development and research; to thoroughly test the (technological) usability before performing an RCT; to test whether guidance of a therapist is needed to optimize effectiveness; and to provide prompts to remind the user to actually use the tool.

Indexed as

Auditory verbal hallucinationsESMMhealthPsychosisVoice hearingVoices

Identifiers

PMID38328276
PMCPMC10847757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.