ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
An experimental census of retrons for DNA production and genome editing.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Retrons are bacterial immune systems that use reverse transcribed DNA as a detector of phage infection. They are also increasingly deployed as a component of biotechnology. For genome editing, for instance, retrons are modified so that the reverse transcribed DNA (RT-DNA) encodes an editing donor. Retrons are commonly found in bacterial genomes; thousands of unique retrons have now been predicted bioinformatically. However, only a small number have been characterized experimentally. Here, we add substantially to the corpus of experimentally studied retrons. We synthesized >100 previously untested retrons to identify the natural sequence of RT-DNA they produce, quantify their RT-DNA production, and test the relative efficacy of editing using retron-derived donors to edit bacterial genomes, phage genomes, and human genomes. We add 62 new empirically determined, natural RT-DNAs, which are not predictable from the retron sequence alone. We report a large diversity in RT-DNA production and editing rates across retrons, finding that top performing editors outperform those used in previous studies, and are drawn from a subset of the retron phylogeny.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.