Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38328179›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Quantifying Interpretation Reproducibility in Vision Transformer Models with TAVAC.

Yue Zhao, Dylan Agyemang, Yang Liu, Matt Mahoney, Sheng Li

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yue ZhaoThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Dylan AgyemangDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Yang LiuThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Matt MahoneyThe Jackson Laboratory for Mouse Genetics, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Sheng LiThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9543-6274

Funding

The Jackson Laboratory Senescence Tissue Mapping Center (JAX-Sen TMC) - Data Analysis CoreU54AG079753 · NIA · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI KORSTANJE, RONNY, ROBSON, PAUL · 2022 to 2025
$11.0M
An Integrative Computational Framework for DNA Hydroxymethylation Data Mining and InterpretationR35GM133562 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI LI, SHENG · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
Multi-omic phenotyping of human transcriptional regulatorsU01HG013175 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Brian S White · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
The impact of reduction of cellular senescence on age-related epigenetic heterogeneityU01CA271830 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DEGREGORI, JAMES V, LI, SHENG · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
Integrating high-throughput histology with systems genetics through causal graphical modelsR01GM141309 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI MAHONEY, JOHN MATTHEW · 2022 to 2025
$1.5M
Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship in the Molecular Biology and Genomics of Human CancerR25CA233420 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Jeffrey Hsu-Min Chuang, Sarah Wojiski · 2019 to 2026
$866k
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA233420NCI NIH HHS U01 CA271830NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG013175NIA NIH HHS U54 AG079753NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM141309NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133562
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of deep learning algorithms to extract meaningful diagnostic features from biomedical images holds the promise to improve patient care given the expansion of digital pathology. Among these deep learning models, Vision Transformer (ViT) models have been demonstrated to capture long-range spatial relationships with more robust prediction power for image classification tasks than regular convolutional neural network (CNN) models, and also better model interpretability. Model interpretation is important for understanding and elucidating how a deep learning model makes predictions, especially for developing transparent models for digital pathology. However, like other deep learning algorithms, with limited annotated biomedical imaging datasets, ViT models are prone to poor performance due to overfitting, which can lead to false predictions due to random noise. Overfitting affects model interpretation when predictions are made out of random noise. To address this issue, we introduce a novel metric - Training Attention and Validation Attention Consistency (TAVAC) - for evaluating ViT model degree of overfitting on imaging datasets and quantifying the reproducibility of interpretation. Specifically, the model interpretation is performed by comparing the high-attention regions in the image between training and testing. We test the method on four publicly available image classification datasets and two independent breast cancer histological image datasets. All overfitted models exhibited significantly lower TAVAC scores than the good-fit models. The TAVAC score quantitatively measures the level of generalization of model interpretation on a fine-grained level for small groups of cells in each H&E image, which cannot be provided by traditional performance evaluation metrics like prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the application of TAVAC extends beyond medical diagnostic AI models; it enhances the monitoring of model interpretative reproducibility at pixel-resolution in basic research, to reveal critical spatial patterns and cellular structures essential to understanding biological processes and disease mechanisms. TAVAC sets a new standard for evaluating the performance of deep learning model interpretation and provides a method for determining the significance of high-attention regions detected from the attention map of the biomedical images.

Identifiers

PMID38328179
PMCPMC10849480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.