Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38328170›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Diagnostically distinct resting state fMRI energy distributions: A subject-specific maximum entropy modeling study.

Nicholas Theis, Jyotika Bahuguna, Jonathan E Rubin, Joshua Cape, Satish Iyengar, Konasale M Prasad

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholas TheisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jyotika BahugunaDepartment of Neuroscience, Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitive et Adaptive, University of Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2858-5325
Jonathan E RubinDepartment of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Joshua CapeDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1471-1650
Satish IyengarDepartment of Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9631-7907
Konasale M PrasadDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0245-1393

Funding

Synaptic Pruning and Complement Gene in Schizophrenia: Imaging & Cellular StudiesR01MH115026 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PRASAD, KONASALE M · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
Dimensional outcomes and neural circuitry associated with psychosis riskR01MH112584 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PRASAD, KONASALE M · 2018 to 2021
$2.1M
CSRD VA I01 CX001855NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112584NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Existing neuroimaging studies of psychotic and mood disorders have reported brain activation differences (first-order properties) and altered pairwise correlation-based functional connectivity (second-order properties). However, both approaches have certain limitations that can be overcome by integrating them in a pairwise maximum entropy model (MEM) that better represents a comprehensive picture of fMRI signal patterns and provides a system-wide summary measure called energy. This study examines the applicability of individual-level MEM for psychiatry and identifies image-derived model coefficients related to model parameters. Method: MEMs are fit to resting state fMRI data from each individual with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and major depression (n=132) and demographically matched healthy controls (n=132) from the UK Biobank to different subsets of the default mode network (DMN) regions. Results: The model satisfactorily explained observed brain energy state occurrence probabilities across all participants, and model parameters were significantly correlated with image-derived coefficients for all groups. Within clinical groups, averaged energy level distributions were higher in schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder but lower in bipolar disorder compared to controls for both bilateral and unilateral DMN. Major depression energy distributions were higher compared to controls only in the right hemisphere DMN. Conclusions: Diagnostically distinct energy states suggest that probability distributions of temporal changes in synchronously active nodes may underlie each diagnostic entity. Subject-specific MEMs allow for factoring in the individual variations compared to traditional group-level inferences, offering an improved measure of biologically meaningful correlates of brain activity that may have potential clinical utility.

Indexed as

Bipolar disorderComputational psychiatryGeneralized Ising modelMajor depressionNetwork neuroscienceSchizophreniaTransdiagnostic approach

Identifiers

PMID38328170
PMCPMC10849576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.