ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Self-Supervised Learning Improves Accuracy and Data Efficiency for IMU-Based Ground Reaction Force Estimation.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Recent deep learning techniques hold promise to enable IMU-driven kinetic assessment; however, they require large extents of ground reaction force (GRF) data to serve as labels for supervised model training. We thus propose using existing self-supervised learning (SSL) techniques to leverage large IMU datasets to pre-train deep learning models, which can improve the accuracy and data efficiency of IMU-based GRF estimation. Methods: We performed SSL by masking a random portion of the input IMU data and training a transformer model to reconstruct the masked portion. We systematically compared a series of masking ratios across three pre-training datasets that included real IMU data, synthetic IMU data, or a combination of the two. Finally, we built models that used pre-training and labeled data to estimate GRF during three prediction tasks: overground walking, treadmill walking, and drop landing. Results: When using the same amount of labeled data, SSL pre-training significantly improved the accuracy of 3-axis GRF estimation during walking compared to baseline models trained by conventional supervised learning. Fine-tuning SSL model with 1-10% of walking data yielded comparable accuracy to training baseline model with 100% of walking data. The optimal masking ratio for SSL is 6.25-12.5%. Conclusion: SSL leveraged large real and synthetic IMU datasets to increase the accuracy and data efficiency of deep-learning-based GRF estimation, reducing the need for labeled data. Significance: This work, with its open-source code and models, may unlock broader use cases of IMU-driven kinetic assessment by mitigating the scarcity of GRF measurements in practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.