ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
A real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system events for diazepam.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug-associated hypertensive crisis: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Muscle toxicity reports in FAERS: a disproportionality analysis with focus on rhabdomyolysis and cross-database assessment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Combination Therapies: A Systematic Review Integrating Network Meta-Analysis and Real-World Vigilance Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A retrospective research of adverse event reporting system events for voxelotor based on the FAERS database.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- Post-marketing safety concerns with relugolix: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.Investigational new drugs · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.