ArticleEuropean urology open science2024
Current Expectations and Opinions on Single-port Robotic Surgery: A Survey Among European Experts by the SPARC Collaborative Group.
Article in European urology open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative short-term efficacy and safety analysis of a single-port robot in nephrectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Single-port robot-assisted pyeloplasty versus multiport pyeloplasty: evidence from controlled trials.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Feasibility and safety of single-port transvesical simple prostatectomy in patients with very large prostates: A volume-stratified analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- Single port robotic hepatectomy: an initial European experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Single-port versus multi-port robotic radical prostatectomy: a within-surgeon, propensity-matched analysis of platform-related effects.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Determinants of access route in single-port off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: A contemporary cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- The current landscape of single-port robotic surgery in urology.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Prone retroperitoneal versus lateral retroperitoneal robotic assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparison.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery in Europe: Where Do We Stand? A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Single-port robot-assisted retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: First European case series.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2025Article
- The evolution and clinical impact of single-port transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy: a comprehensive review.Gland surgery · 2025Review
- Implementation and early outcomes of Da Vinci SP® Robot-Assisted partial nephrectomy via supine anterior retroperitoneal access: Italian single centre experience.Central European journal of urology · 2025Article
- Development of a single port dual arm robotically steerable endoscope for neurosurgical applications.npj Robotics · 2025Article
- The impact of single-port robotic surgery: a survey among urology residents and fellows in the United States.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Early Single-Center Experience of DaVinciJournal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-port (SP) robotic surgery is a relatively new technology that is expected to become available on the European market within a year. We investigated the current expectations of robotic surgery experts and opinion leaders practicing in Europe. A 17-item online questionnaire was sent to 120 participants identified as "experts" on the basis of their general contributions to the field of robotic surgery. Overall, 90 responses were registered, with a response rate of 75%. Italy (30%), France (15%), and the UK (12%) provided the most participants, who worked mainly in academic-either public (60%) or private (20%)-hospitals. Most respondents (79%) had no previous experience with "single site" surgery, and attendance at scientific meetings (79%) and perusal of the literature (65%) were the sources of SP knowledge most frequently reported. The perceived advantages of SP robotic surgery included lower invasiveness (61%), easier access to the retroperitoneal or extraperitoneal space (53%), better cosmetic results (44%), and lower postoperative pain (44%). The most "appealing" SP procedures were retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy via an anterior approach (43%) and transvesical simple prostatectomy (43%). Within the limitations of this type of analysis, our findings suggest high interest and a positive attitude towards SP technology overall. Patient summary: Technology for single-port (SP) robotic surgery, in which just one skin incision is made in the abdomen to perform the operation, will soon be available in Europe. We conducted a survey on SP surgery among European experts in urological robotic surgery. The results show that there is high interest in and a positive attitude to SP surgery. The SP approach could result in better cosmetic results and lower postoperative pain for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.