ArticleCureus2024
Assessment of Medical Students' Knowledge of Ocular First Aid During Trauma: A Cross-Sectional Study From King Abdulaziz University.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Public Awareness of Ocular Chemical Injuries: A Cross-Sectional Study in Lithuania.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Ocular trauma is defined as an eye injury of diverse types and subtypes, all of which can threaten vision. Hence, a precise first-aid approach is crucial to salvage the eyes and prevent blindness. Therefore, this study was designed to assess the level of knowledge among medical students at King Abdulaziz University (KAU) and identify factors that affect knowledge regarding ocular first aid in cases of trauma. Methodology A cross-sectional approach was used, targeting KAU medical students. First, students were asked to voluntarily respond to a previously used questionnaire that contained demographic data, including gender, marital status, socioeconomic status, academic year, and city of residence, followed by a history of ocular trauma. Then, questions were asked to assess their knowledge regarding different types of ocular trauma and proper first aid. Results A total of 310 participants responded to the questionnaire. Participants included both sexes, with 169 (50.8%) being males. Only 89 (26.7%) participants had a history of managing ocular injury. Knowledge levels were divided into good 76 (27%) and poor 201 (73%). Third-year students had the highest percentage of poor knowledge, whereas sixth-year students had the highest level of knowledge. The source of knowledge was mainly from studies. Conclusions The ocular first-aid knowledge level was predominantly poor, accounting for 201 (73%) of all responses. Thus, steps to enhance knowledge should be taken.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.