Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38327925›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

COVID-19 Pandemic Simulation Modelling in Anaesthesia Residency Training to Predict Delays and Workforce Deficiencies: A Case Study of the Singapore Residency Training Program.

Lucy J Davies, Christopher Mathew, Ahmad R Pourghaderi, Adeline Xin Yu Leong, Diana Xin Hui Chan, Darren Liang Khai Koh, Addy Yong Hui Tan, Caroline Yu Ming Ong, John Ong, Sean Shao Wei Lam and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lucy J DaviesDepartment of Paediatric Anaesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Christopher MathewDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Ahmad R PourghaderiSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, AUS.
Adeline Xin Yu LeongDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Diana Xin Hui ChanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Darren Liang Khai KohDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Addy Yong Hui TanDepartment of Anaesthesia, National University Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Caroline Yu Ming OngDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Pain Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
John OngDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & General Internal Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, GBR.
Sean Shao Wei LamSinghealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Singhealth Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, SGP.
Sharon Gek Kim OngDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, SGP.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background COVID-19 has been the worst pandemic of this century, resulting in economic, social, and educational disruptions. Residency training is no exception, with training restrictions delaying the progression and graduation of residents. We sought to utilize simulation modelling to predict the impact on future cohorts in the event of repeated and prolonged movement restrictions due to COVID-19 and future pandemics of a similar nature. Method A Delphi study was conducted to determine key Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-International (ACGME-I) training variables affected by COVID-19. Quantitative resident datasets on these variables were collated and analysed from 2018 to 2021. Using the Vensim® software (Ventana Systems, Inc., Harvard, MA), historical resident data and pandemic progression delays were used to create a novel simulation model to predict future progression delay. Various durations of delay were also programmed into the software to simulate restrictions of varying severity that would impact resident progression. Results Using the model with scenarios simulating varying pandemic length, we found that the estimated average delay for residents in each accredited year ranged from an increase of one month for year 2 residents to more than three months for year 4 residents. Movement restrictions lasting a year would require up to six years before the program returned to a pre-pandemic equilibrium. Conclusion Systems dynamic modelling can be used to predict delays in residency training programs during a pandemic. The impact on the workforce can thus be projected, allowing residency programs to institute mitigating measures to avoid progression delay.

Indexed as

anaesthesiologycovid-19modellingpandemicresidencysimulation

Identifiers

PMID38327925
PMCPMC10848604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.