ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024
Performing highly parallelized and reproducible GWAS analysis on biobank-scale data.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Genetic architecture and cross-platform validation of apolipoprotein A-IV concentrations.Genome biology · 2026Pooled it
- Assessment of the functionality and usability of open-source rare variant analysis pipelines.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Pooled it
- Mendelian Randomization Reveals Interleukin-6 Receptor-Lipoprotein(a) Interplay With Independent Cardiovascular Risk Reductions.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2026Article
- SAGA (Simplified Association Genome-wide Analyses): a user-friendly Pipeline to Democratize Genome-Wide Association Studies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Improving the reliability, quality, and maintainability of bioinformatics pipelines with nf-test.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Nuclear and mitochondrial genetic variants associated with mitochondrial DNA copy number.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- COSGAP: COntainerized Statistical Genetics Analysis Pipelines.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are transforming genetic research and enable the detection of novel genotype-phenotype relationships. In the last two decades, over 60 000 genetic associations across thousands of traits have been discovered using a GWAS approach. Due to increasing sample sizes, researchers are increasingly faced with computational challenges. A reproducible, modular and extensible pipeline with a focus on parallelization is essential to simplify data analysis and to allow researchers to devote their time to other essential tasks. Here we present nf-gwas, a Nextflow pipeline to run biobank-scale GWAS analysis. The pipeline automatically performs numerous pre- and post-processing steps, integrates regression modeling from the REGENIE package and supports single-variant, gene-based and interaction testing. It includes an extensive reporting functionality that allows to inspect thousands of phenotypes and navigate interactive Manhattan plots directly in the web browser. The pipeline is tested using the unit-style testing framework nf-test, a crucial requirement in clinical and pharmaceutical settings. Furthermore, we validated the pipeline against published GWAS datasets and benchmarked the pipeline on high-performance computing and cloud infrastructures to provide cost estimations to end users. nf-gwas is a highly parallelized, scalable and well-tested Nextflow pipeline to perform GWAS analysis in a reproducible manner.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.