ArticleOphthalmology science
Deep Learning Assisted Imaging Methods to Facilitate Access to Ophthalmic Telepathology.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of oculomics artificial intelligence for cardiovascular risk factors: A case study in fundus oculomics for HbA1c assessment and clinically relevant considerations for clinicians.Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the use of super-resolution imaging techniques to enable telepathology using low-cost commercial cameras. Design: Experimental study. Participants: A total of 139 ophthalmic pathology slides obtained from the Ophthalmic Pathology service at the University of California, Irvine. Methods: Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model (DDPM) was developed to predict super-resolution pathology slide images from low-resolution inputs. The model was pretrained using 150 000 images randomly sampled from the ImageNet dataset. Patch aggregation was used to generate large images with DDPM. The performance of DDPM was evaluated against that of generative adversarial networks (GANs) and Robust UNet, which were also trained on the same dataset. Main Outcome Measures: The performance of models trained to generate super-resolution output images from low-resolution input images can be evaluated by using the mean squared error (MSE) and Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM), as well as subjective grades provided by expert pathologist graders. Results: In total, our study included 110 training images, 9 validation images, and 20 testing images. The objective performance scores were averaged over patches generated from 20 test images. The DDPM-based approach with pretraining produced the best results, with an MSE score of 1.35e-5 and an SSIM score of 0.8987. A qualitative analysis of super-resolution images was conducted by expert 3 pathologists and 1 expert ophthalmic microscopist, and the average accuracy of identifying the correct ground truth images ranged from 25% to 70% (with an average accuracy of 46.5%) for widefield images and 25% to 60% (with an average accuracy of 38.25%) for individual patches. Conclusions: The DDPM-based approach with pretraining is assessed to be effective at super-resolution prediction for ophthalmic pathology slides both in terms of objective and subjective measures. The proposed methodology is expected to decrease the reliance on costly slide scanners for acquiring high-quality pathology slide images, while also streamlining clinical workflow and expanding the scope of ophthalmic telepathology. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.