Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38327767›Full record

ArticleVaccine: X2024

In-depth reasons for the high proportion of zero-dose children in underserved populations of Ethiopia: Results from a qualitative study.

Gashaw Andargie Biks, Fisseha Shiferie, Dawit Abraham Tsegaye, Wondwossen Asefa, Legese Alemayehu, Tamiru Wondie, Gobena Seboka, Adrienne Hayes, Uche RalphOpara, Meseret Zelalem and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Gashaw Andargie BiksProject HOPE, Ethiopia Country Office, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Fisseha ShiferieProject HOPE, Ethiopia Country Office, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Dawit Abraham TsegayeProject HOPE, Ethiopia Country Office, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Wondwossen AsefaProject HOPE Headquarter, Washington, DC, United States.
Legese AlemayehuProject HOPE, Ethiopia Country Office, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tamiru WondieProject HOPE, Ethiopia Country Office, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Gobena SebokaProject HOPE, Ethiopia Country Office, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Adrienne HayesProject HOPE Headquarter, Washington, DC, United States.
Uche RalphOparaProject HOPE Headquarter, Washington, DC, United States.
Meseret ZelalemMaternal and Child Health, Minister of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Kidist BeleteUSAID Ethiopia Country Office, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Jen DonofrioBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, United States.
Samson GebremedhinSchool of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing attention is being given to reach children who fail to receive routine vaccinations, commonly designated as zero-dose children. A comprehensive understanding of the supply- and demand-side barriers is essential to inform zero-dose strategies in high-burden countries and achieve global immunization goals. This qualitative study aimed to identify the barriers for reaching zero-dose and under-immunized children and what and explore gender affects access to vaccination services for children in Ethiopia. Data was collected between March-June 2022 using key informant interviews and focus group discussions with participants in underserved settings. The high proportion of zero-dose children was correlated with inadequate information being provided by health workers, irregularities in service provision, suboptimal staff motivation, high staff turnover, closure and inaccessibility of health facilities, lack of functional health posts, service provision limited to selected days or hours, and gender norms viewing females as responsible for childcare. Demand-side barriers included religious beliefs, cultural norms, fear of vaccine side effects, and lack of awareness and sustained interventions. Recommendations to increase vaccination coverage include strengthening health systems such as services integration, human resources capacity building, increasing incentives for health staff, integrating vaccination services, bolstering the EPI budget especially from the government side, and supporting reliable outreach and static immunization services. Additionally, immunization policy should be revised to include gender considerations including male engagement strategies to improve uptake of immunization services.

Indexed as

Focus group discussionGender normsKey informant interviewQualitativeSupply and demand barrier

Identifiers

PMID38327767
PMCPMC10847948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.