Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38327745›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Breast cancer but not the menopausal status is associated with small changes of the gut microbiota.

Natalia Zeber-Lubecka, Maria Kulecka, Agnieszka Jagiełło-Gruszfeld, Michalina Dąbrowska, Anna Kluska, Magdalena Piątkowska, Katarzyna Bagińska, Maria Głowienka, Piotr Surynt, Michał Tenderenda and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Breast Cancer: Extracellular Matrix and Microbiome Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Natalia Zeber-LubeckaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Maria KuleckaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka Jagiełło-GruszfeldDepartment of Breast Cancer & Reconstructive Surgery, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Michalina DąbrowskaDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna KluskaDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena PiątkowskaDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna BagińskaDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Maria GłowienkaDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr SuryntDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Michał TenderendaDepartment of Oncological Surgery and Neuroendocrine Tumors, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Michał MikulaDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Jerzy OstrowskiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Possible relationships between gut dysbiosis and breast cancer (BC) development and progression have been previously reported. However, the results of these metagenomics studies are inconsistent. Our study involved 88 patients diagnosed with breast cancer and 86 cancer-free control women. Participants were divided into groups based on their menopausal status. Fecal samples were collected from 47 and 41 pre- and postmenopausal newly diagnosed breast cancer patients and 51 and 35 pre- and postmenopausal controls, respectively. In this study, we performed shotgun metagenomic analyses to compare the gut microbial community between pre- and postmenopausal BC patients and the corresponding controls. Results: Firstly, we identified 12, 64, 158, and 455 bacterial taxa on the taxonomy level of phyla, families, genera, and species, respectively. Insignificant differences of the Shannon index and β-diversity were found at the genus and species levels between pre- and postmenopausal controls; the differences concerned only the Chao index at the species level. No differences in α-diversity indexes were found between pre- and postmenopausal BC patients, although β-diversity differed these subgroups at the genus and species levels. Consistently, only the abundance of single taxa differed between pre- and postmenopausal controls and cases, while the abundances of 14 and 23 taxa differed or tended to differ between premenopausal cases and controls, and between postmenopausal cases and controls, respectively. There were similar differences in the distribution of enterotypes. Of 460 bacterial MetaCyc pathways discovered, no pathways differentiated pre- and postmenopausal controls or BC patients, while two and one pathways differentiated cases from controls in the pre- and postmenopausal subgroups, respectively. Conclusion: While our findings did not reveal an association of changes in the overall microbiota composition and selected taxa with the menopausal status in cases and controls, they confirmed differences of the gut microbiota between pre- and postmenopausal BC patients and the corresponding controls. However, these differences were less extensive than those described previously.

Indexed as

breast cancergut dysbiosismenopausal statusmicrobiomeshotgun

Identifiers

PMID38327745
PMCPMC10848918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.