Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38327730›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2024

Medication-Free Treatment in Mental Health Care How Does It Differ from Traditional Treatment?

Kari Standal, Ole Andre Solbakken, Jorun Rugkåsa, Margrethe Seeger Halvorsen, Allan Abbass, Christopher Wirsching, Ingrid Engeseth Brakstad, Kristin S Heiervang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03499080 (Medication Free Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03499080 unknown statusnot on this map

Medication Free Treatment: Characteristics, Justification and Outcome

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2018 to 2023Enrolled183ConditionsMental IllnessArmsMedication free treatment, Treatment as usual Myrvegen, Treatment as usual Åråsen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kari StandalDistrict Psychiatric Center Nedre Romerike, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9957-1481
Ole Andre SolbakkenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Jorun RugkåsaHealth Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5842-2845
Margrethe Seeger HalvorsenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2391-7594
Allan AbbassFaculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Christopher WirschingDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid Engeseth BrakstadDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kristin S HeiervangResearch and Development Department, Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Norwegian authorities have implemented treatment units devoted to medication-free mental health treatment nationwide to improve people's freedom of choice. This article examines how medication-free treatment differs from treatment as usual across central dimensions. Methods: The design was mixed methods including questionnaire data on patients from a medication-free unit and two comparison units (n 59 + 124), as well as interviews with patients (n 5) and staff (n 8) in the medication-free unit. Results: Medication-free treatment involved less reliance on medications and more extensive psychosocial treatment that involved a culture of openness, expression of feelings, and focus on individual responsibility and intensive work. The overall extent of patient influence for medication-free treatment compared with standard treatment was not substantially different to standard treatment but varied on different themes. Patients in medication-free treatment had greater freedom to reduce or not use medication. Medication-free treatment was experienced as more demanding. For patients, this could be connected to a stronger sense of purpose and was experienced as helpful but could also be experienced as a type of pressure and lack of understanding. Patients in medication-free treatment reported greater satisfaction with the treatment, which may be linked to a richer psychosocial treatment package that focuses on patient participation and freedom from pressure to use medication. Conclusion: The findings provide insights into how a medication-free treatment service might work and demonstrate its worth as a viable alternative for people who are not comfortable with the current medication focus of mental health care. Patients react differently to increased demands and clinicians should be reflexive of the dimensions of individualism-relationism in medication-free treatment services. This knowledge can be used to further develop and improve both medication-free treatment and standard treatment regarding shared decision-making. Trial Registration: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT03499080) on 17 April 2018.

Indexed as

choicemedication-freemental health carepsychotropics

Identifiers

PMID38327730
PMCPMC10849138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.