Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38327683›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Accounting for unobserved population dynamics and aging error in close-kin mark-recapture assessments.

John D Swenson, Elizabeth N Brooks, Dovi Kacev, Charlotte Boyd, Michael J Kinney, Benjamin Marcy-Quay, Anthony Sévêque, Kevin A Feldheim, Lisa M Komoroske

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Temporal Variability in Effective Size (Molecular ecology resources · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Unraveling the Complexity of theEvolutionary applications · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

John D SwensonDepartment of Environmental Conservation The University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3740-3984
Elizabeth N BrooksPopulation Dynamics Branch, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Woods Hole Massachusetts USA.
Dovi KacevMarine Biology Research Division Scripps Institution of Oceanography San Diego California USA.
Charlotte BoydInternational Union for Conservation of Nature North America Office Washington DC Maryland USA.
Michael J KinneyNOAA Fisheries Pacific Island Fisheries Science Center Honolulu Hawaii USA.
Benjamin Marcy-QuayRubenstein Ecosystem Science Laboratory University of Vermont Burlington Vermont USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6141-9719
Anthony SévêqueDepartment of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Forest and Wildlife Research Center Mississippi State University Mississippi State Mississippi USA.
Kevin A FeldheimPritzker Laboratory for Molecular Systematics and Evolution The Field Museum Chicago Illinois USA.
Lisa M KomoroskeDepartment of Environmental Conservation The University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst Massachusetts USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obtaining robust estimates of population abundance is a central challenge hindering the conservation and management of many threatened and exploited species. Close-kin mark-recapture (CKMR) is a genetics-based approach that has strong potential to improve the monitoring of data-limited species by enabling estimates of abundance, survival, and other parameters for populations that are challenging to assess. However, CKMR models have received limited sensitivity testing under realistic population dynamics and sampling scenarios, impeding the application of the method in population monitoring programs and stock assessments. Here, we use individual-based simulation to examine how unmodeled population dynamics and aging uncertainty affect the accuracy and precision of CKMR parameter estimates under different sampling strategies. We then present adapted models that correct the biases that arise from model misspecification. Our results demonstrate that a simple base-case CKMR model produces robust estimates of population abundance with stable populations that breed annually; however, if a population trend or non-annual breeding dynamics are present, or if year-specific estimates of abundance are desired, a more complex CKMR model must be constructed. In addition, we show that CKMR can generate reliable abundance estimates for adults from a variety of sampling strategies, including juvenile-focused sampling where adults are never directly observed (and aging error is minimal). Finally, we apply a CKMR model that has been adapted for population growth and intermittent breeding to two decades of genetic data from juvenile lemon sharks (

Indexed as

abundanceCKMRdata‐poor fisheriesdemographic modelselasmobranchpopulation dynamicsshark

Identifiers

PMID38327683
PMCPMC10847890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.