ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2024
Analyzing bacterial persistence and dormancy: A bibliometric exploration of 21st century scientific literature.
Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In response to growing concerns about the efficacy of antibiotic treatment, there has been a significant increase in research on bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics over the past two centuries. Such investigations might bring a spotlight on the field's evolution and future prospects. The study was aimed at conducting a measurable bibliometric review of the scientific literature on bacterial persistence and dormancy in the 21st Century. A scientific literature published during 21st Century was analyzed to gain insights into and identify research trends and outputs in persistent bacteria. Bibliometrix (R language package) and the VOS viewer were used to conduct a bibliometric investigation to determine the globally indexed persistent bacteria research output. WoS Core Collection databases were searched for persistent bacteria selected as the subject. A total of 1,160 published documents from 495 sources from the preceding two decades were reviewed. Maximum publications of 112 were observed in 2021 with 860 citations; however, 82 publications appeared in 2015 and were able to get the highest number of citations (4,214), only 43 (3.7%) were single-authored, whereas 1,117 (96.3%) publications are the result of collaborative works. Out of the top 10 countries ranked for publications, the USA took the top spot for the most highly productive country with 435 articles. Dormancy' appeared 2,351 times, followed by '
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.