Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38327602›Full record

ReviewCancer pathogenesis and therapy2023

Oncofertility: Treatment options from bench to bedside.

Divya Gupta, Shubham Singh, Sangeeta Shukla, Sadhana Shrivastava

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer pathogenesis and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Oncologists' current perspective and barriers to men's fertility preservation: a nationwide study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Divya GuptaReproductive Biology and Toxicology Lab, SOS in Zoology, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh 474011, India.
Shubham SinghDepartment of Zoology, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur (C.G.) 495009, India.
Sangeeta ShuklaReproductive Biology and Toxicology Lab, SOS in Zoology, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh 474011, India.
Sadhana ShrivastavaReproductive Biology and Toxicology Lab, SOS in Zoology, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh 474011, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there has been continuous improvement in the treatment and diagnosis of cancer, which has led to a significant improvement in the survival rate of cancer patients. Treatments that include chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, or combined therapy have several side effects that may lead to premature ovarian insufficiency in females or substantial male germ cell loss. Reproductive biologists recommend that all patients who are diagnosed with a malignant tumor must undergo a consultation for fertility protection and preservation. In this review, we discuss the background knowledge, methods, and options for fertility preservation and how these new strategies help oncologists, surgeons, pediatricians, and hematologists, conserve fertility and be aware of the concepts, methods, and importance of fertility guards. This review may aid in the advancement of novel personalized methods for fertility preservation according to patients' conditions.

Indexed as

CancerEmbryo cryopreservationFertility preservationOncofertility

Identifiers

PMID38327602
PMCPMC10846294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.