Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38327596›Full record

ReviewSynthetic biology (Oxford, England)2024

Preparing for the future of precision medicine: synthetic cell drug regulation.

Kira Sampson, Carlise Sorenson, Katarzyna P Adamala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Synthetic biology (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Synthetic cells for phage therapy: a perspective.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kira SampsonDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Carlise SorensonDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Katarzyna P AdamalaDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1066-7207

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic cells are a novel class of cell-like bioreactors, offering the potential for unique advancements in synthetic biology and biomedicine. To realize the potential of those technologies, synthetic cell-based drugs need to go through the drug approval pipeline. Here, we discussed several regulatory challenges, both unique to synthetic cells, as well as challenges typical for any new biomedical technology. Overcoming those difficulties could bring transformative therapies to the market and will create a path to the development and approval of cutting-edge synthetic biology therapies.

Indexed as

artificial cellscell-free protein expressionliposomal bioreactorspersonalized medicinesynthetic cells

Identifiers

PMID38327596
PMCPMC10849770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.