Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38327463›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Damage for gain: The useful damage of the Pitcher's paradox.

Rita Chiaramonte, Gianluca Testa, Antonino Russo, Enrico Buccheri, Massimiliano Milana, Riccardo Prezioso, Vito Pavone, Michele Vecchio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rita ChiaramonteDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Gianluca TestaDepartment of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Section of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Policlinico "Rodolico-San Marco", University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Antonino RussoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Enrico BuccheriDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Massimiliano MilanaDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Riccardo PreziosoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Vito PavoneDepartment of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Section of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Policlinico "Rodolico-San Marco", University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Michele VecchioDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sport-specific adaptations of the glenohumeral joint may arise in adolescent overhead athletes who begin high-performance sports early in life. Research mainly addresses overuse injuries, leaving gaps in prevention, with adults studied more than youths. Objective: This study aims to investigate sport-adaptations of the glenohumeral joint in asymptomatic adolescent volleyball players to identify potential shoulder injury risk factors. Design: Observational study. Setting: Clinical screening campaign conducted at the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit of Policlinic Hospital in Catania, Italy. Participants: Forty asymptomatic under-16 athletes were evaluated. Interventions: Shoulder internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER), range of motion (ROM), total-rotation ROM, glenohumeral IR deficit (GIRD), general joint laxity using Beighton score, apprehension, relocation, O'Brian tests, and ultrasound (US) glenohumeral distance were tested bilaterally. Variables such as the player's position, the age they began the sport, limb dominance, weight, and height were also considered. Results: The median US glenohumeral distance was at 0.42 ± 0.26 cm, which is consistent with the range found in non-dislocated shoulders of a healthy non-athletic population. The ER ROM was significantly greater in the dominant shoulder than the contralateral one (P = 0.0001), and there was a significant correlation between the ER ROM of attackers and their US glenohumeral distance (P = 0.0413). Furthermore, shoulder IR ROM and US glenohumeral distance were not significantly different between the dominant and contralateral limbs (P = 0.05). None of the athletes presented GIRD. Other tests, including the Beighton score, apprehension, and relocation tests, yielded no significant differences between the dominant and contralateral limbs. Conclusions: Despite an increased shoulder ER in the dominant limb, the glenohumeral joint remains stable, suggesting that greater ROM in ER does not equate to instability in overhead athletes without hyperlaxity. Nevertheless, increased ER impacts glenohumeral distance in attacker volleyball players. This finding suggests that the shoulder morphological adaptation process starts early in attackers.

Indexed as

Early diagnosisJoint instabilityRehabilitationShoulderUltrasoundVolleyball

Identifiers

PMID38327463
PMCPMC10847923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.