ArticleHeliyon2024
Development of deep learning framework for anatomical landmark detection and guided dissection line during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Detection of anatomic landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the use of artificial intelligence-a systematic review of the literature.Updates in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in the operating room: A systematic review of AI models for surgical phase, instruments and anatomical structure identification.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic review on the use of artificial intelligence to identify anatomical structures during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a tool towards the future.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Automated Recognition of Hepatocystic Anatomy During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Current Evidence, Clinical Readiness, and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Vision techniques for anatomical structures in laparoscopic surgery: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- LC-YOLOmatch: a novel scene segmentation approach based on YOLO for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy can arise from misinterpretation of biliary anatomy, leading to dissection in improper areas. The integration of a deep learning framework into laparoscopic procedures offers the potential for real-time anatomical landmark recognition, ensuring accurate dissection. The objective of this study is to develop a deep learning framework that can precisely identify anatomical landmarks, including Rouviere's sulcus and the liver base of segment IV, and provide a guided dissection line during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: We retrospectively collected 40 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos and extracted 80 images form each video to establish the dataset. Three surgeons annotated the bounding boxes of anatomical landmarks on a total of 3200 images. The YOLOv7 model was trained to detect Rouviere's sulcus and the liver base of segment IV as anatomical landmarks. Additionally, the guided dissection line was generated between these two landmarks by the proposed algorithm. To evaluate the performance of the detection model, mean average precision (mAP), precision, and recall were calculated. Furthermore, the accuracy of the guided dissection line was evaluated by three surgeons. The performance of the detection model was compared to the scaled-YOLOv4 and YOLOv5 models. Finally, the proposed framework was deployed in the operating room for real-time detection and visualization. Results: The overall performance of the YOLOv7 model on validation set and testing set were 98.1 % and 91.3 %, respectively. Surgeons accepted the visualization of guide dissection line with a rate of 95.71 %. In the operating room, the well-trained model accurately identified the anatomical landmarks and generated the guided dissection line in real-time. Conclusions: The proposed framework effectively identifies anatomical landmarks and generates a guided dissection line in real-time during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This research underscores the potential of using deep learning models as computer-assisted tools in surgery, providing an assistant tool to accommodate with surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.