Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38327316›Full record

ArticleBiodiversity data journal2023

Developing the Protocol Infrastructure for DNA Sequencing Natural History Collections.

Giada Ferrari, Lore Esselens, Michelle L Hart, Steven Janssens, Catherine Kidner, Maurizio Mascarello, Joshua V Peñalba, Flávia Pezzini, Thomas von Rintelen, Gontran Sonet and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prospects for Complete DNA Barcode Coverage of the New Zealand Insect Fauna.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Giada FerrariRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom.
Lore EsselensRoyal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium Royal Museum for Central Africa Tervuren Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0454-7663
Michelle L HartRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom.
Steven JanssensMeise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.
Catherine KidnerRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom.
Maurizio MascarelloMeise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0325-2345
Joshua V PeñalbaMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science Berlin Germany.
Flávia PezziniRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom.
Thomas von RintelenMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science Berlin Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6253-3078
Gontran SonetRoyal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences Brussels Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7310-9574
Carl VangestelRoyal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences Brussels Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1024-8213
Massimiliano VirgilioRoyal Museum for Central Africa, Department of African Zoology, Tervuren, Belgium Royal Museum for Central Africa, Department of African Zoology Tervuren Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1323-6886
Peter M HollingsworthRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Edinburgh United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intentionally preserved biological material in natural history collections represents a vast repository of biodiversity. Advances in laboratory and sequencing technologies have made these specimens increasingly accessible for genomic analyses, offering a window into the genetic past of species and often permitting access to information that can no longer be sampled in the wild. Due to their age, preparation and storage conditions, DNA retrieved from museum and herbarium specimens is often poor in yield, heavily fragmented and biochemically modified. This not only poses methodological challenges in recovering nucleotide sequences, but also makes such investigations susceptible to environmental and laboratory contamination. In this paper, we review the practical challenges associated with making the recovery of DNA sequence data from museum collections more routine. We first review key operational principles and issues to address, to guide the decision-making process and dialogue between researchers and curators about when and how to sample museum specimens for genomic analyses. We then outline the range of steps that can be taken to reduce the likelihood of contamination including laboratory set-ups, workflows and working practices. We finish by presenting a series of case studies, each focusing on protocol practicalities for the application of different mainstream methodologies to museum specimens including: (i) shotgun sequencing of insect mitogenomes, (ii) whole genome sequencing of insects, (iii) genome skimming to recover plant plastid genomes from herbarium specimens, (iv) target capture of multi-locus nuclear sequences from herbarium specimens, (v) RAD-sequencing of bird specimens and (vi) shotgun sequencing of ancient bovid bone samples.

Indexed as

biodiversity genomicshDNAMuseomicsnatural history collection sequencing

Identifiers

PMID38327316
PMCPMC10848826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.